Accuracy of Four Apex Locators in Premolars with Root Resorption: An In vitro Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Astrid López-Maekawa, Carmen Rosa García Rupay
{"title":"Accuracy of Four Apex Locators in Premolars with Root Resorption: An <i>In vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Astrid López-Maekawa,&nbsp;Carmen Rosa García Rupay","doi":"10.22037/iej.v17i1.35498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the present <i>in vitro</i> study was to compare the accuracy of the working length measurements of four foramen locators: Root ZX mini, Raypex 6, Woodpex III and Propex Pixi in uniradicular premolars with simulated root resorption.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For this study, 30 single-rooted permanent premolars were selected. The samples were divided into two groups: 15 teeth with simulated external root resorption and 15 teeth with internal resorption. Each sample was immersed in containers with alginate covering only the root part. Measurements were acquired from the four foramen locators and compared with the working length measurements that have been previously obtained with the direct visual technique and the use of a Digital USB Microscope under 5×. Next, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test was applied. The ANOVA test and <i>t</i>-test for related samples were performed, in order to analyze the measurements obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the teeth with external resorption, no statistically significant differences in the measurements were obtained with Raypex 6 and Propex Pixi foramen locators, but there were statistically significant differences with Root ZX mini and Woodpex III Root Zx mini [Root Zx mini (<i>P</i>=0.040) and Woodpex III (<i>P</i>=0.000)]. On the other hand, in the samples with internal root resorption, there were no statistically significant differences in measurements with the Root ZX mini, Propex Pixi and Raypex 6 foramen locators. However, there were significant differences with Woodpex III.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on this <i>in vitro</i> study, Raypex 6 had the highest accuracy in premolars with simulated external resorption and Root ZX mini was the most accurate in teeth with simulated internal resorption. Furthermore, external root resorption affects the accuracy of foramen locators more than internal resorption.</p>","PeriodicalId":14534,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Endodontic Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/17/IEJ-17-20.PMC9868988.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v17i1.35498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of the working length measurements of four foramen locators: Root ZX mini, Raypex 6, Woodpex III and Propex Pixi in uniradicular premolars with simulated root resorption.

Materials and methods: For this study, 30 single-rooted permanent premolars were selected. The samples were divided into two groups: 15 teeth with simulated external root resorption and 15 teeth with internal resorption. Each sample was immersed in containers with alginate covering only the root part. Measurements were acquired from the four foramen locators and compared with the working length measurements that have been previously obtained with the direct visual technique and the use of a Digital USB Microscope under 5×. Next, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test was applied. The ANOVA test and t-test for related samples were performed, in order to analyze the measurements obtained.

Results: In the teeth with external resorption, no statistically significant differences in the measurements were obtained with Raypex 6 and Propex Pixi foramen locators, but there were statistically significant differences with Root ZX mini and Woodpex III Root Zx mini [Root Zx mini (P=0.040) and Woodpex III (P=0.000)]. On the other hand, in the samples with internal root resorption, there were no statistically significant differences in measurements with the Root ZX mini, Propex Pixi and Raypex 6 foramen locators. However, there were significant differences with Woodpex III.

Conclusions: Based on this in vitro study, Raypex 6 had the highest accuracy in premolars with simulated external resorption and Root ZX mini was the most accurate in teeth with simulated internal resorption. Furthermore, external root resorption affects the accuracy of foramen locators more than internal resorption.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

四种牙尖定位器在牙根吸收前磨牙中准确性的体外研究。
摘要:本实验的目的是比较根ZX mini、Raypex 6、Woodpex III和Propex Pixi四种牙孔定位器在模拟牙根吸收的单根前磨牙工作长度测量的准确性。材料和方法:本研究选择30颗单根恒磨牙。将样品分为模拟外牙根吸收组和模拟内牙根吸收组。每个样品浸泡在海藻酸盐只覆盖根部的容器中。测量结果来自四个孔定位器,并与先前使用直接视觉技术和使用数字USB显微镜在5倍下获得的工作长度测量结果进行比较。接下来,应用Shapiro-Wilk正态性检验。对相关样本进行方差分析和t检验,以分析所得测量值。结果:在有外吸收的牙齿中,使用Raypex 6和Propex Pixi牙槽定位器测量的结果差异无统计学意义,但使用Root ZX mini和Woodpex III根ZX mini测量的结果差异有统计学意义[Root ZX mini (P=0.040)和Woodpex III根ZX mini (P=0.000)]。另一方面,在有根内吸收的样本中,使用root ZX mini、Propex Pixi和Raypex 6牙孔定位器的测量结果没有统计学意义上的差异。但与Woodpex III有显著差异。结论:在体外实验中,Raypex 6在模拟外吸收的前磨牙上的准确性最高,而Root ZX mini在模拟内吸收的牙齿上的准确性最高。此外,根外吸收比根内吸收更能影响牙孔定位器的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Endodontic Journal
Iranian Endodontic Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Endodontic Journal (IEJ) is an international peer-reviewed biomedical publication, the aim of which is to provide a scientific medium of communication for researchers throughout the globe. IEJ aims to publish the highest quality articles, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Endodontics. The journal is an official Journal of the Iranian Center for Endodontic Research (ICER) and the Iranian Association of Endodontists (IAE). The Journal welcomes articles related to the scientific or applied aspects of endodontics e.g. original researches, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, review articles, clinical trials, case series/reports, hypotheses, letters to the editor, etc. From the beginning (i.e. since 2006), the IEJ was the first open access endodontic journal in the world, which gave readers free and instant access to published articles and enabling them faster discovery of the latest endodontic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信