Validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical, Mental, and Social Health Measures After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Implications for Patient Care.

IF 6.9 2区 医学
Elizabeth A Hahn, Mary N Walsh, Larry A Allen, Christopher S Lee, Quin E Denfeld, Jeffrey J Teuteberg, David G Beiser, Colleen K McIlvennan, JoAnn Lindenfeld, Liviu Klein, Eric D Adler, Josef Stehlik, Bernice Ruo, Katy Bedjeti, Peter D Cummings, Alyssa M Vela, Kathleen L Grady
{"title":"Validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical, Mental, and Social Health Measures After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Implications for Patient Care.","authors":"Elizabeth A Hahn,&nbsp;Mary N Walsh,&nbsp;Larry A Allen,&nbsp;Christopher S Lee,&nbsp;Quin E Denfeld,&nbsp;Jeffrey J Teuteberg,&nbsp;David G Beiser,&nbsp;Colleen K McIlvennan,&nbsp;JoAnn Lindenfeld,&nbsp;Liviu Klein,&nbsp;Eric D Adler,&nbsp;Josef Stehlik,&nbsp;Bernice Ruo,&nbsp;Katy Bedjeti,&nbsp;Peter D Cummings,&nbsp;Alyssa M Vela,&nbsp;Kathleen L Grady","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A better understanding is needed of the burdens and benefits of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation on patients' physical, mental, and social well-being. The purpose of this report was to evaluate the validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures for LVAD patients and to estimate clinically important score differences likely to have implications for patient treatment or care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults from 12 sites across all US geographic regions completed PROMIS measures ≥3 months post-LVAD implantation. Other patient-reported outcomes (eg, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 item), clinician ratings, performance tests, and clinical adverse events were used as validity indicators. Criterion and construct validity and clinically important differences were estimated with Pearson correlations, ANOVA methods, and Cohen d effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants' (n=648) mean age was 58 years, and the majority were men (78%), non-Hispanic White people (68%), with dilated cardiomyopathy (55%), long-term implantation strategy (57%), and New York Heart Association classes I and II (54%). Most correlations between validity indicators and PROMIS measures were medium to large (≥0.3; <i>p</i><0.01). Most validity analyses demonstrated medium-to-large effect sizes (≥0.5) and clinically important differences in mean PROMIS scores (up to 14.8 points). Ranges of minimally important differences for 4 PROMIS measures were as follows: fatigue (3-5 points), physical function (2-3), ability to participate in social roles and activities (3), and satisfaction with social roles and activities (3-5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings provide convincing evidence for the relevance and validity of PROMIS physical, mental, and social health measures in patients from early-to-late post-LVAD implantation. Findings may inform shared decision-making when patients consider treatment options. Patients with an LVAD, their caregivers, and their clinicians should find it useful to interpret the meaning of their PROMIS scores in relation to the general population, that is, PROMIS may help to monitor a return to normalcy in everyday life.</p>","PeriodicalId":10301,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":"16 2","pages":"e008690"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ba/6c/hcq-16-e008690.PMC9940833.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008690","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: A better understanding is needed of the burdens and benefits of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation on patients' physical, mental, and social well-being. The purpose of this report was to evaluate the validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures for LVAD patients and to estimate clinically important score differences likely to have implications for patient treatment or care.

Methods: Adults from 12 sites across all US geographic regions completed PROMIS measures ≥3 months post-LVAD implantation. Other patient-reported outcomes (eg, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 item), clinician ratings, performance tests, and clinical adverse events were used as validity indicators. Criterion and construct validity and clinically important differences were estimated with Pearson correlations, ANOVA methods, and Cohen d effect sizes.

Results: Participants' (n=648) mean age was 58 years, and the majority were men (78%), non-Hispanic White people (68%), with dilated cardiomyopathy (55%), long-term implantation strategy (57%), and New York Heart Association classes I and II (54%). Most correlations between validity indicators and PROMIS measures were medium to large (≥0.3; p<0.01). Most validity analyses demonstrated medium-to-large effect sizes (≥0.5) and clinically important differences in mean PROMIS scores (up to 14.8 points). Ranges of minimally important differences for 4 PROMIS measures were as follows: fatigue (3-5 points), physical function (2-3), ability to participate in social roles and activities (3), and satisfaction with social roles and activities (3-5).

Conclusions: The findings provide convincing evidence for the relevance and validity of PROMIS physical, mental, and social health measures in patients from early-to-late post-LVAD implantation. Findings may inform shared decision-making when patients consider treatment options. Patients with an LVAD, their caregivers, and their clinicians should find it useful to interpret the meaning of their PROMIS scores in relation to the general population, that is, PROMIS may help to monitor a return to normalcy in everyday life.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

左心室辅助装置植入后身体、心理和社会健康测量的有效性及其对患者护理的意义。
背景:需要更好地了解左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入对患者身体、精神和社会福祉的负担和益处。本报告的目的是评估患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)测量LVAD患者的有效性,并估计可能对患者治疗或护理有影响的临床重要评分差异。方法:来自美国所有地理区域的12个地点的成年人在lvad植入后≥3个月完成PROMIS测量。其他患者报告的结果(如堪萨斯城心肌病问卷-12项)、临床医生评分、性能测试和临床不良事件被用作效度指标。采用Pearson相关、ANOVA方法和Cohen效应量估计标准和结构效度及临床重要差异。结果:参与者(n=648)平均年龄为58岁,大多数为男性(78%),非西班牙裔白人(68%),患有扩张性心肌病(55%),长期植入策略(57%),纽约心脏协会I级和II级(54%)。效度指标与PROMIS测量之间的相关性大多为中至大(≥0.3;结论:本研究结果为lvad植入后早期至晚期PROMIS生理、心理和社会健康指标的相关性和有效性提供了令人信服的证据。当患者考虑治疗方案时,研究结果可能会为共同决策提供信息。LVAD患者、他们的护理人员和他们的临床医生应该发现,解释他们的PROMIS评分与一般人群的关系是有用的,也就是说,PROMIS可能有助于监测他们在日常生活中恢复正常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信