Fractal Dimension of Peripapillary Vasculature in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Q3 Medicine
Chae Hyun Song, Seok Hwan Kim, Kyoung Min Lee
{"title":"Fractal Dimension of Peripapillary Vasculature in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.","authors":"Chae Hyun Song,&nbsp;Seok Hwan Kim,&nbsp;Kyoung Min Lee","doi":"10.3341/kjo.2022.0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the fractal dimensions of the peripapillary microvasculature as obtained by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Optic nerve head and peripapillary area images were taken using the 20° × 20°-scan of Spectralis OCTA (Heidelberg Engineering) in 97 subjects (64 POAG patients, 33 control patients). The optic nerve head microvasculature was evaluated according to predefined slabs: the superficial vascular complex (SVC) and the avascular complex (AVC). The en face image of each slab was processed by ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health) in order to calculate the vessel density and the fractal dimension using the box-counting method. For comparison, the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was obtained from Spectralis OCT circle scans. The utilities of the parameters for discriminating between the POAG and control groups were assessed using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SVC fractal dimension was lower in the POAG than in the control group (p < 0.001), while AVC showed no intergroup difference (p = 0.563). The fractal dimension showed a good correlation with the vessel density in both SVC and AVC (both p < 0.001). In a multivariable regression analysis, the SVC fractal dimension was negatively correlated with age (p < 0.001) and axial length (p < 0.001) and positively correlated with average RNFL thickness (p < 0.001), while the AVC fractal dimension was positively correlated with the Bruch's membrane opening size (p = 0.013). In terms of diagnostic utility, the AUC was significantly larger for the average RNFL thickness (AUC, 0.889) than for the SVC fractal dimension (AUC, 0.772; p = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The fractal dimension of SVC was associated with the average RNFL thickness and was reduced in POAG patients. Fractal dimension analysis could be used in evaluating peripapillary vascularity by OCTA.</p>","PeriodicalId":17883,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO","volume":"36 6","pages":"518-526"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/57/kjo-2022-0089.PMC9745347.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2022.0089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the fractal dimensions of the peripapillary microvasculature as obtained by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and controls.

Methods: Optic nerve head and peripapillary area images were taken using the 20° × 20°-scan of Spectralis OCTA (Heidelberg Engineering) in 97 subjects (64 POAG patients, 33 control patients). The optic nerve head microvasculature was evaluated according to predefined slabs: the superficial vascular complex (SVC) and the avascular complex (AVC). The en face image of each slab was processed by ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health) in order to calculate the vessel density and the fractal dimension using the box-counting method. For comparison, the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was obtained from Spectralis OCT circle scans. The utilities of the parameters for discriminating between the POAG and control groups were assessed using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs).

Results: The SVC fractal dimension was lower in the POAG than in the control group (p < 0.001), while AVC showed no intergroup difference (p = 0.563). The fractal dimension showed a good correlation with the vessel density in both SVC and AVC (both p < 0.001). In a multivariable regression analysis, the SVC fractal dimension was negatively correlated with age (p < 0.001) and axial length (p < 0.001) and positively correlated with average RNFL thickness (p < 0.001), while the AVC fractal dimension was positively correlated with the Bruch's membrane opening size (p = 0.013). In terms of diagnostic utility, the AUC was significantly larger for the average RNFL thickness (AUC, 0.889) than for the SVC fractal dimension (AUC, 0.772; p = 0.008).

Conclusions: The fractal dimension of SVC was associated with the average RNFL thickness and was reduced in POAG patients. Fractal dimension analysis could be used in evaluating peripapillary vascularity by OCTA.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

原发性开角型青光眼乳头周围血管的分形维数。
目的:比较原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)与对照组的光学相干断层血管造影(OCTA)所获得的乳头周围微血管分形维数。方法:采用Spectralis OCTA (Heidelberg Engineering) 20°× 20°扫描,对97例患者(POAG患者64例,对照组33例)的视神经头部和乳头周围区域进行扫描。视神经头微血管按照预先设定的标准进行评估:浅血管复合体(SVC)和无血管复合体(AVC)。采用ImageJ软件(美国国立卫生研究院)对各板的正面图像进行处理,采用箱形计数法计算血管密度和分形维数。为了比较,通过Spectralis OCT圆扫描获得乳头周围视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度。使用受试者工作特征曲线(auc)下的面积来评估区分POAG组和对照组的参数的效用。结果:POAG组SVC分形维数低于对照组(p < 0.001), AVC组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.563)。SVC和AVC的分形维数与血管密度呈良好的相关性(p < 0.001)。在多变量回归分析中,SVC分形维数与年龄(p < 0.001)、轴向长度(p < 0.001)呈负相关,与RNFL平均厚度呈正相关(p < 0.001), AVC分形维数与Bruch膜开口大小呈正相关(p = 0.013)。在诊断效用方面,平均RNFL厚度(AUC, 0.889)的AUC显著大于SVC分形维数(AUC, 0.772;P = 0.008)。结论:SVC分形维数与RNFL平均厚度相关,POAG患者分形维数降低。分形维数分析可用于OCTA评价乳头周围血管状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信