Clinical decision-making using an assessment protocol of swallowing function after aspiration pneumonia: a comparative retrospective study.

Abstract

Objective: Aspiration pneumonia is a challenge in Japan, with many elderly citizens; however, there are insufficient experts on swallowing. Non-expert doctors may suspend oral intake for an overly long period because of the fear of further aspiration. We devised and modified an assessment protocol for swallowing function with reference to the Japanese and American practical guidelines for dysphagia. This study aimed to demonstrate clinical decision-making using the protocol by reporting the results of decisions on the safe and timely restart of adequate food intake for patients with aspiration pneumonia. Patients and Methods: This comparative retrospective study included 101 patients hospitalized with aspiration pneumonia between April 2015 and November 2017. We compared the parameters of patients for whom decisions on resumption of oral intake were aided by our protocol against those of patients from the previous year when the protocol was not used. We counted the days until either resumption of oral intake or events of aspiration/choking. Results: The duration of days until oral intake in the two groups was 1.64 ± 2.34 days in the protocol group (56 patients) and 2.09 ± 2.30 days in the control group (45 patients) (P=0.52). The adverse events of aspiration/choking were less frequent in the protocol group (5 vs. 15, odds ratio (OR) 0.32, P<0.001) as compared to the control group. The protocol group showed a significant reduction in aspiration/choking (OR 0.19, P<0.01). Conclusion: Clinical decision-making based on the protocol seems to help non-expert doctors make informed decisions regarding resuming oral intake after aspiration pneumonia.