Do exercise therapies restore the deficits of joint position sense in patients with chronic ankle instability? A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Xiao'ao Xue , Weichu Tao , Xiaoyun Xu , Zhengbiao Jin , Qianru Li , Yiran Wang , Xicheng Gu , Ru Wang , Yinghui Hua
{"title":"Do exercise therapies restore the deficits of joint position sense in patients with chronic ankle instability? A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Xiao'ao Xue ,&nbsp;Weichu Tao ,&nbsp;Xiaoyun Xu ,&nbsp;Zhengbiao Jin ,&nbsp;Qianru Li ,&nbsp;Yiran Wang ,&nbsp;Xicheng Gu ,&nbsp;Ru Wang ,&nbsp;Yinghui Hua","doi":"10.1016/j.smhs.2023.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To determine whether existing exercise therapies can restore the joint position sense (JPS) deficits of patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) when compared with controlled non-training patients. Seven databases were searched using ankle, injury, proprioception, and exercise-therapy-related terms. Peer-reviewed human studies in English that used the absolute errors score of joint position reproduction (JPR) test to compare the JPS of injured ankles in CAI patients before and after exercise therapy and non-training controls were included and analyzed. Demographic information, sample size, description of exercise therapies, methodological details of the JPR test, and absolute error scores were extracted by two researchers independently. Meta-analysis of the differences in JPS changes (i.e., absolute errors after treatment minus the baseline) between the exercise therapies and non-training controls was performed with the weighted mean difference (<em>WMD</em>) and 95% confidence interval (<em>CI</em>). Seven studies were finally included. Meta-analyses revealed significantly higher improvements in passive JPS during inversion with, <em>WMD</em> ​= ​−1.54° and eversion, of, <em>WMD</em> ​= ​−1.80°, after exercise therapies when compared with non-training controls. However, no significant changes in the impaired side active JPS were observed with regard to inversion and eversion. Existing exercise therapies may have a positive effect on passive JPS during inversion and eversion, but do not restore the active JPS deficits of injured ankles in patients with CAI when compared with non-training controls. Updated exercise components with a longer duration that focus on active JPS with longer duration are needed to supplement the existing content of exercise therapies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33620,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 67-73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/a4/main.PMC10040377.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266633762300001X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine whether existing exercise therapies can restore the joint position sense (JPS) deficits of patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) when compared with controlled non-training patients. Seven databases were searched using ankle, injury, proprioception, and exercise-therapy-related terms. Peer-reviewed human studies in English that used the absolute errors score of joint position reproduction (JPR) test to compare the JPS of injured ankles in CAI patients before and after exercise therapy and non-training controls were included and analyzed. Demographic information, sample size, description of exercise therapies, methodological details of the JPR test, and absolute error scores were extracted by two researchers independently. Meta-analysis of the differences in JPS changes (i.e., absolute errors after treatment minus the baseline) between the exercise therapies and non-training controls was performed with the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Seven studies were finally included. Meta-analyses revealed significantly higher improvements in passive JPS during inversion with, WMD ​= ​−1.54° and eversion, of, WMD ​= ​−1.80°, after exercise therapies when compared with non-training controls. However, no significant changes in the impaired side active JPS were observed with regard to inversion and eversion. Existing exercise therapies may have a positive effect on passive JPS during inversion and eversion, but do not restore the active JPS deficits of injured ankles in patients with CAI when compared with non-training controls. Updated exercise components with a longer duration that focus on active JPS with longer duration are needed to supplement the existing content of exercise therapies.

Abstract Image

运动疗法能恢复慢性踝关节不稳患者的关节位置感缺损吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析
确定与对照的非训练患者相比,现有的运动疗法是否可以恢复慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)患者的关节位置感(JPS)缺陷。使用踝关节、损伤、本体感觉和运动治疗相关术语搜索了七个数据库。纳入并分析了英语同行评审的人类研究,该研究使用关节位置再现(JPR)测试的绝对误差分数来比较CAI患者在运动治疗前后和非训练对照组受伤脚踝的JPS。人口统计学信息、样本量、运动疗法描述、JPR测试的方法细节和绝对误差分数由两名研究人员独立提取。用加权平均差(WMD)和95%置信区间(CI)对运动疗法和非训练对照之间JPS变化的差异(即治疗后的绝对误差减去基线)进行荟萃分析。最终纳入了七项研究。荟萃分析显示,在大规模杀伤性武器的反演过程中,被动JPS有更高的改进​=​−1.54°和大规模杀伤性武器​=​−1.80°,运动治疗后与非训练对照组相比。然而,受损侧活动JPS在倒置和外翻方面没有观察到显著变化。现有的运动疗法可能对内翻和外翻过程中的被动JPS有积极影响,但与非训练对照组相比,不能恢复CAI患者受伤脚踝的主动JPS缺陷。需要更新持续时间较长的运动成分,重点关注持续时间较长、活跃的JPS,以补充运动疗法的现有内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Medicine and Health Science
Sports Medicine and Health Science Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信