Correlated play in weakest-link and best-shot group contests

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Stefano Barbieri , Iryna Topolyan
{"title":"Correlated play in weakest-link and best-shot group contests","authors":"Stefano Barbieri ,&nbsp;Iryna Topolyan","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We explore public randomization (Harris et al., 1995) in group contests and introduce group public randomization equilibria (GPRE). We consider group all-pay auctions with weakest-link and best-shot impact functions. While best-shot contests without public randomization are known for their multiplicity of equilibria, introducing public randomization results in a unique GPRE in which only one of the strongest players in each group is active. However, in the weakest-link case, the well-known multiplicity of equilibria becomes even more pronounced with public randomization. Despite this multiplicity, a refinement that selects GPRE immune to coalitional deviations reduces the gamut of GPRE to a unique equilibrium group-effort distribution, which, for identical groups composed of identical agents, features the highest expected total effort among all equilibria of the full information game without correlation devices. The (weak) increase in expected efforts due to correlated strategies is also observed in the best-shot case.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50145,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 102917"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406823001106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We explore public randomization (Harris et al., 1995) in group contests and introduce group public randomization equilibria (GPRE). We consider group all-pay auctions with weakest-link and best-shot impact functions. While best-shot contests without public randomization are known for their multiplicity of equilibria, introducing public randomization results in a unique GPRE in which only one of the strongest players in each group is active. However, in the weakest-link case, the well-known multiplicity of equilibria becomes even more pronounced with public randomization. Despite this multiplicity, a refinement that selects GPRE immune to coalitional deviations reduces the gamut of GPRE to a unique equilibrium group-effort distribution, which, for identical groups composed of identical agents, features the highest expected total effort among all equilibria of the full information game without correlation devices. The (weak) increase in expected efforts due to correlated strategies is also observed in the best-shot case.

在最弱的环节和最好的投篮小组比赛中相互关联
我们探讨了群体竞赛中的公共随机化(Harris et al., 1995),并引入了群体公共随机化均衡(GPRE)。我们考虑具有最弱链接和最佳冲击功能的团体全付费拍卖。虽然没有公共随机化的最佳射击比赛以其多重平衡而闻名,但引入公共随机化会产生独特的GPRE,其中每个组中只有一个最强的玩家活跃。然而,在最薄弱环节的情况下,众所周知的多重均衡在公共随机化中变得更加明显。尽管存在这种多样性,但选择不受联盟偏差影响的GPRE的改进将GPRE的范围减小到一个独特的均衡群体努力分布,对于由相同代理组成的相同群体,该群体在没有相关设备的完全信息博弈的所有均衡中具有最高的期望总努力。由于相关策略导致的预期努力(微弱)增加也在最佳射击情况下观察到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Economics
Journal of Mathematical Economics 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary objective of the Journal is to provide a forum for work in economic theory which expresses economic ideas using formal mathematical reasoning. For work to add to this primary objective, it is not sufficient that the mathematical reasoning be new and correct. The work must have real economic content. The economic ideas must be interesting and important. These ideas may pertain to any field of economics or any school of economic thought.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信