Teacher Scaffolding and Equity in Collaborative Knowledge Construction

Q1 Social Sciences
Elizabeth Kraatz , Tzu-Jung Lin, Manisha Nagpal , Lynley Anderman
{"title":"Teacher Scaffolding and Equity in Collaborative Knowledge Construction","authors":"Elizabeth Kraatz ,&nbsp;Tzu-Jung Lin,&nbsp;Manisha Nagpal ,&nbsp;Lynley Anderman","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines teacher scaffolding and equity during collaborative small-group discussions in fifth-grade English language arts classrooms. Equity indicators analyzed include uptake, relational invitations, and conflicts for the floor (CFF). CFF indicates lower levels of participatory equity, while the others indicate higher relational equity. Three types of teacher scaffolding moves were included, and data were analyzed using statistical discourse analysis and repeated measures logistic regression. Teacher scaffolding was either negatively or not related to all equity indicators. Specifically, teacher scaffolding is associated with reduced indicators of relational equity, but also with reductions in CFF. The relationship with relational equity was stronger and more consistent than the relationship with CFF, suggesting that teachers’ largest influence on equity is on relational, rather than participatory, equity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266637402300081X/pdfft?md5=3bb5091de972b721b3e57b680162690b&pid=1-s2.0-S266637402300081X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266637402300081X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines teacher scaffolding and equity during collaborative small-group discussions in fifth-grade English language arts classrooms. Equity indicators analyzed include uptake, relational invitations, and conflicts for the floor (CFF). CFF indicates lower levels of participatory equity, while the others indicate higher relational equity. Three types of teacher scaffolding moves were included, and data were analyzed using statistical discourse analysis and repeated measures logistic regression. Teacher scaffolding was either negatively or not related to all equity indicators. Specifically, teacher scaffolding is associated with reduced indicators of relational equity, but also with reductions in CFF. The relationship with relational equity was stronger and more consistent than the relationship with CFF, suggesting that teachers’ largest influence on equity is on relational, rather than participatory, equity.

协同知识建构中的教师脚手架与公平
本研究探讨五年级英语语言艺术课堂合作小组讨论中的教师框架与公平。所分析的公平指标包括吸收、关系邀请和底层冲突(CFF)。CFF表明参与性公平水平较低,而其他指标表明关系公平水平较高。采用统计语篇分析和重复测量逻辑回归对三种类型的教师脚手架行为进行数据分析。教师脚手架与所有公平指标呈负相关或不相关。具体而言,教师脚手架与关系公平指标的降低有关,但也与CFF的降低有关。与关系公平的关系比与CFF的关系更强,更一致,这表明教师对公平的最大影响是关系公平,而不是参与公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信