Research engagement and research capacity building: a priority for healthcare organisations in the UK.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Stephen Peckham, Wenjing Zhang, Tamsyn Eida, Ferhana Hashem, Sally Kendall
{"title":"Research engagement and research capacity building: a priority for healthcare organisations in the UK.","authors":"Stephen Peckham,&nbsp;Wenjing Zhang,&nbsp;Tamsyn Eida,&nbsp;Ferhana Hashem,&nbsp;Sally Kendall","doi":"10.1108/JHOM-12-2021-0436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To research involvement of healthcare staff in the UK and identify practical organisational and policy solutions to improve and boost capacity of the existing workforce to conduct research.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>A mixed-method study presenting three work packages here: secondary analysis of levels of staff research activity, funding, academic outputs and workforce among healthcare organisations in the United Kingdom; 39 Research and Development lead and funder interviews; an online survey of 11 healthcare organisations across the UK, with 1,016 responses from healthcare staff included for analysis; and 51 interviews of healthcare staff in different roles from six UK healthcare organisations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Interest in research involvement is strong and widespread but hampered by a lack of systematic organisational support despite national policies and strategies to increase staff engagement in research. While useful, these external strategies have limited universal success due to lack of organisational support. Healthcare organisations should embed research within organisational and human resources policies and increase the visibility of research through strategic organisational goals and governance processes. A systems-based approach is needed.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>The research gathered data from a limited number of NHS trusts but these were purposively sampled to provide a range of different acute/community health service organisations in different areas. But data was therefore more detailed and nuanced due to a more in-depth approach.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>The findings are relevant for developing policies and practice within healthcare organisations to support research engagement. The findings also set out key policy and strategic recommendations that will support greater research engagement.</p><p><strong>Social implications: </strong>Increased research activity and engagement in healthcare providers improves healthcare outcomes for patients.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This is a large scale (UK-wide) study involving a broad range of healthcare staff, with good engagement of nurses, midwives and Allied Healthcare Professionals who have not been previously achieved. This allowed valuable analysis of under-researched groups and comparisons by professional groups. The findings highlight the need for tailored action to embed research reporting, skills, professional development and infrastructure into organisational policies, strategies and systems, along with broader system-wide development.</p>","PeriodicalId":47447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","volume":"ahead-of-print ahead-of-print","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-12-2021-0436","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To research involvement of healthcare staff in the UK and identify practical organisational and policy solutions to improve and boost capacity of the existing workforce to conduct research.

Design/methodology/approach: A mixed-method study presenting three work packages here: secondary analysis of levels of staff research activity, funding, academic outputs and workforce among healthcare organisations in the United Kingdom; 39 Research and Development lead and funder interviews; an online survey of 11 healthcare organisations across the UK, with 1,016 responses from healthcare staff included for analysis; and 51 interviews of healthcare staff in different roles from six UK healthcare organisations.

Findings: Interest in research involvement is strong and widespread but hampered by a lack of systematic organisational support despite national policies and strategies to increase staff engagement in research. While useful, these external strategies have limited universal success due to lack of organisational support. Healthcare organisations should embed research within organisational and human resources policies and increase the visibility of research through strategic organisational goals and governance processes. A systems-based approach is needed.

Research limitations/implications: The research gathered data from a limited number of NHS trusts but these were purposively sampled to provide a range of different acute/community health service organisations in different areas. But data was therefore more detailed and nuanced due to a more in-depth approach.

Practical implications: The findings are relevant for developing policies and practice within healthcare organisations to support research engagement. The findings also set out key policy and strategic recommendations that will support greater research engagement.

Social implications: Increased research activity and engagement in healthcare providers improves healthcare outcomes for patients.

Originality/value: This is a large scale (UK-wide) study involving a broad range of healthcare staff, with good engagement of nurses, midwives and Allied Healthcare Professionals who have not been previously achieved. This allowed valuable analysis of under-researched groups and comparisons by professional groups. The findings highlight the need for tailored action to embed research reporting, skills, professional development and infrastructure into organisational policies, strategies and systems, along with broader system-wide development.

研究参与和研究能力建设:在英国医疗机构的优先事项。
目的:研究英国医疗保健工作人员的参与情况,并确定切实可行的组织和政策解决方案,以改善和提高现有工作人员进行研究的能力。设计/方法/方法:一项混合方法研究,在这里提出三个工作包:对联合王国医疗保健组织的工作人员研究活动、资金、学术产出和劳动力水平的二级分析;39位研发负责人和资助者访谈;一项针对英国11家医疗机构的在线调查,包括1016名医疗人员的回复进行分析;和51位来自六个英国医疗机构的不同角色的医疗人员的访谈。研究发现:对研究参与的兴趣是强烈和广泛的,但是由于缺乏系统的组织支持而受到阻碍,尽管国家政策和战略增加了工作人员对研究的参与。虽然有用,但由于缺乏组织支持,这些外部战略的普遍成功有限。医疗保健组织应该将研究嵌入到组织和人力资源政策中,并通过战略组织目标和治理流程提高研究的可见性。需要一种基于系统的方法。研究局限性/影响:该研究从有限数量的NHS信托中收集数据,但这些数据是有目的的抽样,以提供不同地区的一系列不同的急性/社区卫生服务组织。但由于采用了更深入的方法,数据因此更加详细和微妙。实际意义:研究结果是相关的发展政策和实践在医疗保健组织,以支持研究参与。调查结果还提出了支持更多研究参与的关键政策和战略建议。社会影响:增加医疗保健提供者的研究活动和参与,可改善患者的医疗保健结果。原创性/价值:这是一项大规模的(全英国范围的)研究,涉及广泛的医疗保健人员,护士、助产士和联合医疗保健专业人员的良好参与,这是以前没有实现的。这允许对研究不足的群体进行有价值的分析,并由专业团体进行比较。研究结果强调需要采取量身定制的行动,将研究报告、技能、专业发展和基础设施纳入组织政策、战略和系统,以及更广泛的全系统发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: ■International health and international organizations ■Organisational behaviour, governance, management and leadership ■The inter-relationship of health and public sector services ■Theories and practices of management and leadership in health and related organizations ■Emotion in health care organizations ■Management education and training ■Industrial relations and human resource theory and management. As the demands on the health care industry both polarize and intensify, effective management of financial and human resources, the restructuring of organizations and the handling of market forces are increasingly important areas for the industry to address.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信