Evaluación de nuevos criterios de osteoporosis en la diabetes tipo 2

Pedro Rozas Moreno , Rebeca Reyes García , Antonia García Martín , Gema López Gallardo , Mariela Varsavsky , Manuel Muñoz Torres
{"title":"Evaluación de nuevos criterios de osteoporosis en la diabetes tipo 2","authors":"Pedro Rozas Moreno ,&nbsp;Rebeca Reyes García ,&nbsp;Antonia García Martín ,&nbsp;Gema López Gallardo ,&nbsp;Mariela Varsavsky ,&nbsp;Manuel Muñoz Torres","doi":"10.1016/j.avdiab.2012.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Recent data suggest new diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM): femoral neck Tscore below -1.9 in women and below -2.1 in men. Our objective was to evaluate the percentage of patients diagnosed with osteoporosis according to these new criteria in a population of T2DM patients, and to analyse if there were differences compared to the WHO criteria for osteoporosis.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional study including 78 T2DM patients. Bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated by dual X-Ray absorptiometry (DXA, Hologic QDR 4500). The percentage of patients with osteoporosis was determined using the WHO criteria (T-score &lt;2.5) and also according to the new criteria. Data were processed and analysed with SPSS 15.0.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean age was 57.8 years (57.8±6.4). According to the WHO criteria, 19% of patients had lumbar osteoporosis, 2.6% osteoporosis in femoral neck (FN), and 4% in total femur (TF). When the new criteria were used, 29% of patients had lumbar spine osteoporosis, 11.5% FN osteoporosis, and 10% TF osteoporosis (<em>P</em>&lt;.05 for all compared to WHO classification).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The application of the new criteria for diagnosis of osteoporosis in T2DM enables a higher number of cases to be identified, which can help to improve the assessment of fracture risk in T2DM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100152,"journal":{"name":"Avances en Diabetología","volume":"28 5","pages":"Pages 114-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.avdiab.2012.10.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avances en Diabetología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134323012001196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Recent data suggest new diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM): femoral neck Tscore below -1.9 in women and below -2.1 in men. Our objective was to evaluate the percentage of patients diagnosed with osteoporosis according to these new criteria in a population of T2DM patients, and to analyse if there were differences compared to the WHO criteria for osteoporosis.

Material and methods

Cross-sectional study including 78 T2DM patients. Bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated by dual X-Ray absorptiometry (DXA, Hologic QDR 4500). The percentage of patients with osteoporosis was determined using the WHO criteria (T-score <2.5) and also according to the new criteria. Data were processed and analysed with SPSS 15.0.

Results

Mean age was 57.8 years (57.8±6.4). According to the WHO criteria, 19% of patients had lumbar osteoporosis, 2.6% osteoporosis in femoral neck (FN), and 4% in total femur (TF). When the new criteria were used, 29% of patients had lumbar spine osteoporosis, 11.5% FN osteoporosis, and 10% TF osteoporosis (P<.05 for all compared to WHO classification).

Conclusions

The application of the new criteria for diagnosis of osteoporosis in T2DM enables a higher number of cases to be identified, which can help to improve the assessment of fracture risk in T2DM.

2型糖尿病骨质疏松新标准的评估
目的最近的数据提出了2型糖尿病(T2DM)骨质疏松的新诊断标准:女性股骨颈Tscore低于-1.9,男性低于-2.1。我们的目的是评估T2DM患者中根据这些新标准诊断为骨质疏松症的患者的百分比,并分析与WHO骨质疏松症标准相比是否存在差异。材料与方法对78例T2DM患者进行横断面研究。采用双x线吸收仪(DXA, Hologic QDR 4500)评估骨密度(BMD)。骨质疏松患者的百分比采用WHO标准(T-score <2.5)和新标准确定。采用SPSS 15.0软件对数据进行处理和分析。结果患者平均年龄57.8岁(57.8±6.4)岁。根据WHO标准,19%的患者有腰椎骨质疏松症,2.6%的骨质疏松症发生在股骨颈(FN), 4%的骨质疏松症发生在全股骨(TF)。当采用新标准时,29%的患者患有腰椎骨质疏松症,11.5%的患者患有FN骨质疏松症,10%的患者患有TF骨质疏松症(P<与世卫组织分类相比,所有人都为05)。结论新的T2DM骨质疏松诊断标准的应用,可提高T2DM患者骨折风险的诊断数量,有助于提高对T2DM患者骨折风险的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信