Evaluating access, quality, and equity in online learning: A case study of a MOOC-based blended professional degree program

IF 6.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Joshua Littenberg-Tobias , Justin Reich
{"title":"Evaluating access, quality, and equity in online learning: A case study of a MOOC-based blended professional degree program","authors":"Joshua Littenberg-Tobias ,&nbsp;Justin Reich","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>As massive open online courses (MOOCs) shift toward professional degree and certificate programs, can they become a global on-ramp for increasing access to emerging fields for underrepresented groups? This mixed-methods study addresses this question by examining one of the first MOOC-based blended professional degree programs, which admitted students to an accelerated residential master's program on the basis of performance in MOOCs and a proctored exam. We found that male students and students with master's degrees were more likely to complete the online program and the blended program had more male students and more students with master's degrees than students in the existing residential program. Students who enrolled in the blended graduate program earned higher average grades than students in the residential program earned in their in-person courses (3.86 vs 3.75, </span><em>p</em> &lt; .01). The findings of this study provide an example of how new online learning models can serve particular niches, but may not address broader equity challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100759"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100759","citationCount":"83","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109675162030035X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 83

Abstract

As massive open online courses (MOOCs) shift toward professional degree and certificate programs, can they become a global on-ramp for increasing access to emerging fields for underrepresented groups? This mixed-methods study addresses this question by examining one of the first MOOC-based blended professional degree programs, which admitted students to an accelerated residential master's program on the basis of performance in MOOCs and a proctored exam. We found that male students and students with master's degrees were more likely to complete the online program and the blended program had more male students and more students with master's degrees than students in the existing residential program. Students who enrolled in the blended graduate program earned higher average grades than students in the residential program earned in their in-person courses (3.86 vs 3.75, p < .01). The findings of this study provide an example of how new online learning models can serve particular niches, but may not address broader equity challenges.

评估在线学习的可及性、质量和公平性:基于mooc的混合专业学位课程的案例研究
随着大规模在线开放课程(MOOCs)向专业学位和证书课程转变,它们能否成为一个全球性的入口,为未被充分代表的群体提供更多进入新兴领域的机会?这项混合方法研究通过考察首批基于mooc的混合专业学位课程之一来解决这个问题,该课程根据学生在mooc的表现和监考考试的表现,录取学生参加一个加速的住宿硕士课程。我们发现,男性学生和拥有硕士学位的学生更有可能完成在线课程,而混合课程的男性学生和拥有硕士学位的学生比现有住宿课程的学生更多。参加混合研究生课程的学生的平均成绩高于参加住宿课程的学生在面对面课程中的平均成绩(3.86比3.75,p <. 01)。这项研究的结果提供了一个例子,说明新的在线学习模式如何能够服务于特定的利基市场,但可能无法解决更广泛的公平挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internet and Higher Education
Internet and Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The Internet and Higher Education is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal focused on contemporary issues and future trends in online learning, teaching, and administration within post-secondary education. It welcomes contributions from diverse academic disciplines worldwide and provides a platform for theory papers, research studies, critical essays, editorials, reviews, case studies, and social commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信