Re-assessing “readiness” in OWI: Toward a trauma-informed approach to supporting students in online writing courses

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Lynn Reid
{"title":"Re-assessing “readiness” in OWI: Toward a trauma-informed approach to supporting students in online writing courses","authors":"Lynn Reid","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2022.102738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This article examines the construct of student success that is forwarded by readiness assessments designed to evaluate students’ preparation for online learning. These readiness assessments emphasize factors such as time management, motivation, and access to and fluency with technology, suggesting to students that if they possess strengths in these areas, they will likely do well in a course. For students who struggle in OWCs–often disproportionately representing minoritized and historically disenfranchised populations in higher education–these readiness assessments fall short of providing the resources that students need to understand the cognitive demands of OWCs. I propose recasting </span>student performance through a trauma-informed lens to focus attention on what students can learn in order to be successful in their online courses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 102738"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Composition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461522000469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the construct of student success that is forwarded by readiness assessments designed to evaluate students’ preparation for online learning. These readiness assessments emphasize factors such as time management, motivation, and access to and fluency with technology, suggesting to students that if they possess strengths in these areas, they will likely do well in a course. For students who struggle in OWCs–often disproportionately representing minoritized and historically disenfranchised populations in higher education–these readiness assessments fall short of providing the resources that students need to understand the cognitive demands of OWCs. I propose recasting student performance through a trauma-informed lens to focus attention on what students can learn in order to be successful in their online courses.

重新评估OWI中的“准备程度”:以一种创伤知情的方式支持在线写作课程的学生
本文考察了学生成功的构建,这是通过准备评估来评估学生对在线学习的准备。这些准备评估强调诸如时间管理、动机、获取和熟练使用技术等因素,向学生暗示,如果他们在这些方面拥有优势,他们可能会在课程中表现出色。对于那些在校外学习中挣扎的学生来说——他们往往不成比例地代表着高等教育中的少数族裔和历史上被剥夺权利的人群——这些准备程度评估无法为学生提供了解校外学习认知需求所需的资源。我建议从创伤的角度来重新审视学生的表现,把注意力集中在学生能学到什么,以便在他们的在线课程中取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers and Composition
Computers and Composition Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Composition: An International Journal is devoted to exploring the use of computers in writing classes, writing programs, and writing research. It provides a forum for discussing issues connected with writing and computer use. It also offers information about integrating computers into writing programs on the basis of sound theoretical and pedagogical decisions, and empirical evidence. It welcomes articles, reviews, and letters to the Editors that may be of interest to readers, including descriptions of computer-aided writing and/or reading instruction, discussions of topics related to computer use of software development; explorations of controversial ethical, legal, or social issues related to the use of computers in writing programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信