The examination of dietary survey methods used in the Nagasaki Prefecture health and nutrition survey

Saki Chinen, Kayoko Matsuo, K. Miyahara, Mizuho Nakayama, K. Kawano, Miki Okamoto
{"title":"The examination of dietary survey methods used in the Nagasaki Prefecture health and nutrition survey","authors":"Saki Chinen, Kayoko Matsuo, K. Miyahara, Mizuho Nakayama, K. Kawano, Miki Okamoto","doi":"10.2740/jisdh.30.2_79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conducted a Brief-type Self-administered Diet History Questionnaire ( BDHQ ) survey in conjunction with the use of the food-weighing method involving participants of the 2016 Nagasaki Prefecture health and nutrition survey ( prefectural survey ) , in order to compare the obtained data and examine the questionnaire’s usefulness. As the results of a comparison of the two dietary surveys, the difference in the mean values of energy intake was -1 . 2 to +2 . 9 % , showing the validity of the data. With regard to the level of nutrient intake, the validity was also confirmed, as the difference in values of energy-producing nutrients was less than ±10% for most items. On the other hand, the validity of the data for vitamins was not confirmed, as the difference was more than ±10 % for many items. This variation may be caused by the difference in the time of measurement between the food-weighing method ( 1 day ) and BDHQ ( 1 month ) . The results of this study showed that the implementation of the BDHQ during the prefectural survey is effective in reducing the burden on investigators, and may contribute to understanding the regular nutritional intake of people in the Prefecture and improving their health awareness through feedback of the questionnaire results. However, its introduction to the prefectural survey should be carefully considered, keeping in mind the low validity of","PeriodicalId":14708,"journal":{"name":"Journal for The Integrated Study of Dietary Habits","volume":"103 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for The Integrated Study of Dietary Habits","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2740/jisdh.30.2_79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We conducted a Brief-type Self-administered Diet History Questionnaire ( BDHQ ) survey in conjunction with the use of the food-weighing method involving participants of the 2016 Nagasaki Prefecture health and nutrition survey ( prefectural survey ) , in order to compare the obtained data and examine the questionnaire’s usefulness. As the results of a comparison of the two dietary surveys, the difference in the mean values of energy intake was -1 . 2 to +2 . 9 % , showing the validity of the data. With regard to the level of nutrient intake, the validity was also confirmed, as the difference in values of energy-producing nutrients was less than ±10% for most items. On the other hand, the validity of the data for vitamins was not confirmed, as the difference was more than ±10 % for many items. This variation may be caused by the difference in the time of measurement between the food-weighing method ( 1 day ) and BDHQ ( 1 month ) . The results of this study showed that the implementation of the BDHQ during the prefectural survey is effective in reducing the burden on investigators, and may contribute to understanding the regular nutritional intake of people in the Prefecture and improving their health awareness through feedback of the questionnaire results. However, its introduction to the prefectural survey should be carefully considered, keeping in mind the low validity of
对长崎县健康和营养调查中使用的饮食调查方法的审查
本研究结合食物称重法,对2016年长崎县健康与营养调查(县调查)的参与者进行了简短型自填饮食史问卷(BDHQ)调查,以比较所得数据并检验问卷的有用性。根据两项饮食调查的比较结果,能量摄入的平均值相差为-1。2到+2。9%,表明数据的有效性。在营养摄入水平上,大多数项目的产能营养素值差异小于±10%,也证实了有效性。另一方面,维生素数据的有效性没有得到证实,因为许多项目的差异超过±10%。这种差异可能是由于食物称重法(1天)和BDHQ(1个月)的测量时间不同造成的。本研究结果表明,在县域调查中实施BDHQ可有效减轻调查人员的负担,并可通过问卷结果的反馈,帮助了解县域居民的常规营养摄入情况,提高健康意识。然而,在将其引入地级市调查时应慎重考虑,要牢记其低效度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信