Panel Session 3: Event-Driven Architectures and Complex Event Processing

O. Etzion, M. Chandy, R. V. Ammon, R. Schulte
{"title":"Panel Session 3: Event-Driven Architectures and Complex Event Processing","authors":"O. Etzion, M. Chandy, R. V. Ammon, R. Schulte","doi":"10.1109/ICWS.2006.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are different and conflicting views made by analysts and some vendors about the relative positioning of SOA and EDA. The panel is intended to investigate the relative positioning and determine pros and cons for a unified SOA-EDA solution. The panel questions will concentrate on: (1) what is the difference between the service-oriented approach to the event-oriented approach? (2) What are common between the two approaches? (3) Is combination of the two (\"SOA 2.0\") makes sense. (4) What are its value add to customers?","PeriodicalId":73287,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Web Services : proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Web Services","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Web Services : proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Web Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2006.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are different and conflicting views made by analysts and some vendors about the relative positioning of SOA and EDA. The panel is intended to investigate the relative positioning and determine pros and cons for a unified SOA-EDA solution. The panel questions will concentrate on: (1) what is the difference between the service-oriented approach to the event-oriented approach? (2) What are common between the two approaches? (3) Is combination of the two ("SOA 2.0") makes sense. (4) What are its value add to customers?
分组会议3:事件驱动架构和复杂事件处理
对于SOA和EDA的相对定位,分析师和一些供应商提出了不同的、相互冲突的观点。该小组旨在调查相对定位,并确定统一SOA-EDA解决方案的优缺点。小组问题将集中于:(1)面向服务的方法与面向事件的方法之间的区别是什么?(2)这两种方法的共同点是什么?(3)两者的结合(“SOA 2.0”)有意义吗?(4)对客户的增值是什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信