A Comparison of Telemedicine and Office Visit Payments in a Commercially Insured Population.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kathleen Carey
{"title":"A Comparison of Telemedicine and Office Visit Payments in a Commercially Insured Population.","authors":"Kathleen Carey","doi":"10.1177/10775587221113340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, commercial insurers have been slowly advancing coverage for telemedicine, raising questions regarding payment. Many states now have laws that address telemedicine reimbursement and as of 2019, 10 required full payment parity. Using a large commercial insurance claims database, this study conducted two natural experiments to better understand whether payment parity is effective in driving more telemedicine provision. Payments for common outpatient procedures provided by telemedicine and in offices during 2018-2019 were examined according to whether the service was subject to payment parity. For medical visits, evidence of payment incentives in promoting telemedicine was limited, and for psychotherapy telemedicine payments were comparable or greater than office visit payments. As telemedicine escalated during the COVID-19 peak and continues to grow beyond the pandemic, a valuable message is that payment parity laws may be a less effective strategy for encouraging telemedicine use than presumed by many state policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":"80 2","pages":"228-235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587221113340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, commercial insurers have been slowly advancing coverage for telemedicine, raising questions regarding payment. Many states now have laws that address telemedicine reimbursement and as of 2019, 10 required full payment parity. Using a large commercial insurance claims database, this study conducted two natural experiments to better understand whether payment parity is effective in driving more telemedicine provision. Payments for common outpatient procedures provided by telemedicine and in offices during 2018-2019 were examined according to whether the service was subject to payment parity. For medical visits, evidence of payment incentives in promoting telemedicine was limited, and for psychotherapy telemedicine payments were comparable or greater than office visit payments. As telemedicine escalated during the COVID-19 peak and continues to grow beyond the pandemic, a valuable message is that payment parity laws may be a less effective strategy for encouraging telemedicine use than presumed by many state policymakers.

商业保险人群中远程医疗和办公室就诊费用的比较。
近年来,商业保险公司一直在缓慢推进远程医疗的覆盖范围,这引发了有关支付的问题。许多州现在都有解决远程医疗报销问题的法律,截至2019年,有10个州要求全额支付平价。利用大型商业保险索赔数据库,本研究进行了两个自然实验,以更好地了解支付平价是否有效地推动了更多的远程医疗提供。根据远程医疗和办公室在2018-2019年期间提供的常见门诊程序的支付情况,检查该服务是否符合支付平价。对于医疗访问,促进远程医疗支付激励的证据有限,对于心理治疗,远程医疗支付与办公室访问支付相当或更高。随着远程医疗在COVID-19高峰期间不断升级,并在大流行之后继续发展,一个有价值的信息是,在鼓励远程医疗使用方面,支付平价法可能不如许多州政策制定者所认为的那样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Care Research and Review
Medical Care Research and Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Care Research and Review (MCRR) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal containing critical reviews of literature on organizational structure, economics, and the financing of health and medical care systems. MCRR also includes original empirical and theoretical research and trends to enable policy makers to make informed decisions, as well as to identify health care trends. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 25 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信