The Laparoscopic Irrigator Aspirator: A Time and Cost Saving Alternative Irrigation Method for Open Fractures

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
José George, C. M. Hoshino, S. Shymon
{"title":"The Laparoscopic Irrigator Aspirator: A Time and Cost Saving Alternative Irrigation Method for Open Fractures","authors":"José George, C. M. Hoshino, S. Shymon","doi":"10.1097/bto.0000000000000622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: At our institution, the laparoscopic irrigator aspirator (LIA) is used as the primary means of irrigation in open fractures, as it allows for quicker and more efficient irrigation. The purpose of this technical trick is to evaluate the cost and time savings between gravity tubing, pulse lavage, and LIA methods. Materials and Methods: The 3 different methods of irrigation, gravity tubing, pulse lavage, and LIA, were set up, and the time to use one 3 L bag of normal saline was recorded for each. The list prices for each method of irrigation were obtained, and the time and cost saved per 3 L bag was multiplied by 3 for the total time and cost 9 L of irrigation. Results: The LIA was the most efficient irrigation method and saved 303 seconds over gravity and 534 seconds saved over pulse lavage over 9 L. For cost, the laparoscopic resulted in $156.15 saved over gravity and $332.80 saved over pulse lavage over 9 L when accounting for cost of operating room time and cost of implant. At our institution, 34 open tibia fractures were treated in 2019, which results in 2.86 hours and $5309.10 saved over gravity and 5.04 hours and $11,315.2 saved over pulse lavage by using the LIA. Conclusions: Lap irrigation is a viable alternative to gravity tubing and pulse lavage for open fracture irrigation and results in both time and cost savings.","PeriodicalId":45336,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Orthopaedics","volume":"2001 1","pages":"141 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bto.0000000000000622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: At our institution, the laparoscopic irrigator aspirator (LIA) is used as the primary means of irrigation in open fractures, as it allows for quicker and more efficient irrigation. The purpose of this technical trick is to evaluate the cost and time savings between gravity tubing, pulse lavage, and LIA methods. Materials and Methods: The 3 different methods of irrigation, gravity tubing, pulse lavage, and LIA, were set up, and the time to use one 3 L bag of normal saline was recorded for each. The list prices for each method of irrigation were obtained, and the time and cost saved per 3 L bag was multiplied by 3 for the total time and cost 9 L of irrigation. Results: The LIA was the most efficient irrigation method and saved 303 seconds over gravity and 534 seconds saved over pulse lavage over 9 L. For cost, the laparoscopic resulted in $156.15 saved over gravity and $332.80 saved over pulse lavage over 9 L when accounting for cost of operating room time and cost of implant. At our institution, 34 open tibia fractures were treated in 2019, which results in 2.86 hours and $5309.10 saved over gravity and 5.04 hours and $11,315.2 saved over pulse lavage by using the LIA. Conclusions: Lap irrigation is a viable alternative to gravity tubing and pulse lavage for open fracture irrigation and results in both time and cost savings.
腹腔镜冲洗器:一种既省时又省钱的开放性骨折的替代冲洗方法
简介:在我们的机构,腹腔镜冲洗器(LIA)被用作开放性骨折的主要冲洗手段,因为它可以更快、更有效地进行冲洗。这项技术的目的是评估重力管、脉冲灌洗和LIA方法之间的成本和时间节省。材料与方法:设置重力管灌胃、脉冲灌胃、LIA灌胃3种灌胃方式,记录每种灌胃方式使用生理盐水1袋(3l)的时间。得到每种灌溉方法的目录价格,将每3l袋节省的时间和成本乘以3,得到灌溉总时间和成本9l。结果:LIA是最有效的灌洗方式,比重力灌洗节省303秒,比9 L脉冲灌洗节省534秒。在成本方面,考虑手术室时间成本和植入物成本,腹腔镜灌洗比重力灌洗节省156.15美元,比9 L脉冲灌洗节省332.80美元。在我们机构,2019年治疗了34例开放性胫骨骨折,使用LIA比重力节省了2.86小时和5309.10美元,比脉冲灌洗节省了5.04小时和11315.2美元。结论:在开放性骨折冲洗中,膝灌洗是重力管和脉冲灌洗的可行替代方案,可以节省时间和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The purpose of Techniques in Orthopaedics is to provide information on the latest orthopaedic procedure as they are devised and used by top orthopaedic surgeons. The approach is technique-oriented, covering operations, manipulations, and instruments being developed and applied in such as arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and trauma. Each issue is guest-edited by an expert in the field and devoted to a single topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信