A Comparative Study on the Evaluation of BOD Analysis Methods

Ah-Hyen Kim, Bong-Gwan Yu, Dae-Shin Kang, Ji-hyeon Kim, Jeong-Won Kang, Sung-Hee Yoon, Soo-Mi Choi
{"title":"A Comparative Study on the Evaluation of BOD Analysis Methods","authors":"Ah-Hyen Kim, Bong-Gwan Yu, Dae-Shin Kang, Ji-hyeon Kim, Jeong-Won Kang, Sung-Hee Yoon, Soo-Mi Choi","doi":"10.36278/jeaht.26.2.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, data for increasing the efficiency of researcher manpower and establishing the validity of the electrode method are presented via a comparative evaluation of the titrimetric and electrode methods for BOD analysis. When comparing the analysis results of the titrimetric and electrode methods for wastewater, sewage, and leachate, no difference was observed between two methods. Therefore, if the electrode method is used instead of the titrimetric method, the amount of reagents for BOD analysis can be effectively reduced, resulting in a decreaded workloads for analysts as well as the hazards and risks posed to them, ultimately. In addition, the amount of acid wastes generated due to the use of sulfuric acid can be reduced, thereby reducing costs, which is economically beneficial.","PeriodicalId":15758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36278/jeaht.26.2.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, data for increasing the efficiency of researcher manpower and establishing the validity of the electrode method are presented via a comparative evaluation of the titrimetric and electrode methods for BOD analysis. When comparing the analysis results of the titrimetric and electrode methods for wastewater, sewage, and leachate, no difference was observed between two methods. Therefore, if the electrode method is used instead of the titrimetric method, the amount of reagents for BOD analysis can be effectively reduced, resulting in a decreaded workloads for analysts as well as the hazards and risks posed to them, ultimately. In addition, the amount of acid wastes generated due to the use of sulfuric acid can be reduced, thereby reducing costs, which is economically beneficial.
生物需氧量分析方法评价的比较研究
在本研究中,通过对滴定法和电极法进行对比评价,为提高研究人员的人力效率和建立电极法的有效性提供了数据。将滴定法和电极法对废水、污水和渗滤液的分析结果进行比较,两种方法之间没有差异。因此,如果用电极法代替滴定法,可以有效地减少生化需氧量分析所用试剂的数量,从而减少分析人员的工作量,减少分析人员所面临的危害和风险。此外,还可以减少因使用硫酸而产生的酸性废物的数量,从而降低成本,具有经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信