ACCESSING AND EXPLOITING EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE SOURCES: THE EFFECT OF SECTOR AND FIRM TECHNOLOGICAL INTENSITY

M. Segarra-Ciprés, J. Bou-Llusar, Vicente Roca-Puig
{"title":"ACCESSING AND EXPLOITING EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE SOURCES: THE EFFECT OF SECTOR AND FIRM TECHNOLOGICAL INTENSITY","authors":"M. Segarra-Ciprés, J. Bou-Llusar, Vicente Roca-Puig","doi":"10.5172/IMPP.V14I2.1950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses whether the technological environment in which firms operate conditions the opening up of the innovation process, or whether it is the firm’s R&D efforts, regardless of the sector it operates in, that determine to a greater extent the firm’s capacity to access, assimilate and exploit external knowledge. Using negative binomial models, the paper analyses the effect of external sources of knowledge on innovation outputs, and the moderator effect of technological intensity of the sector and firm. Results show that the most R&D intensive firms and sectors access external sources of knowledge to a greater extent than those which are less R&D intensive. In contrast, no substantial differences emerge with regard to the exploitation of these sources. Results also show that opening up the innovation process is not a sectoral phenomenon, since there are significant differences in the use of external sources within the industry itself. Highly open, dynamic and innovative firms can be found in low technology-intensive sectors, indicating that heterogeneity in intra-industrial innovative behaviour should be taken into account when formulating sector-based policies to support the opening up of the innovation process.","PeriodicalId":13564,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-management Policy & Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation-management Policy & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5172/IMPP.V14I2.1950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyses whether the technological environment in which firms operate conditions the opening up of the innovation process, or whether it is the firm’s R&D efforts, regardless of the sector it operates in, that determine to a greater extent the firm’s capacity to access, assimilate and exploit external knowledge. Using negative binomial models, the paper analyses the effect of external sources of knowledge on innovation outputs, and the moderator effect of technological intensity of the sector and firm. Results show that the most R&D intensive firms and sectors access external sources of knowledge to a greater extent than those which are less R&D intensive. In contrast, no substantial differences emerge with regard to the exploitation of these sources. Results also show that opening up the innovation process is not a sectoral phenomenon, since there are significant differences in the use of external sources within the industry itself. Highly open, dynamic and innovative firms can be found in low technology-intensive sectors, indicating that heterogeneity in intra-industrial innovative behaviour should be taken into account when formulating sector-based policies to support the opening up of the innovation process.
获取和开发外部知识资源:部门和企业技术强度的影响
本文分析了企业所处的技术环境是否决定了创新过程的开放性,或者企业的研发努力是否在更大程度上决定了企业获取、吸收和利用外部知识的能力,而不管企业在哪个行业经营。本文采用负二项模型,分析了外部知识来源对创新产出的影响,以及部门和企业技术强度的调节作用。研究结果表明,研发密集度高的企业和部门获取外部知识的程度高于研发密集度低的企业和部门。相比之下,在开发利用这些资源方面没有出现实质性差异。研究结果还表明,开放创新过程并不是一个行业现象,因为行业内部对外部资源的利用存在显著差异。在低技术密集部门可以找到高度开放、充满活力和创新的公司,这表明在制定以部门为基础的政策以支持创新过程的开放时,应考虑到产业内创新行为的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信