Desarrollo del debate teórico en torno al nacionalismo y la nación a través del esquema kuhniano

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Guillermo Reyes Pascual
{"title":"Desarrollo del debate teórico en torno al nacionalismo y la nación a través del esquema kuhniano","authors":"Guillermo Reyes Pascual","doi":"10.3989/arbor.2019.794n4006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For purposes of analysis and also to find meaning, much has been written about two intrinsically-linked terms: nationalism and the nation. The main positive consequence of this has been a vast theoretical debate about nationalism and the nation that undoubtedly enriches them. On the other hand, the main negative consequence is that development of the debate itself and its evolution have received little attention. The aim of this article is to show how this debate was constructed around the four classical paradigms of nationalism. To do this, the Kuhnian scheme is applied to determine when, how, and why these classical paradigms were articulated around these two terms. The main purpose of this is to delve into the historical explanation given by Moreno Almendral (2015), but from the philosophy of science, developing a much more detailed vision of the debate around nationalism and the nation.","PeriodicalId":45891,"journal":{"name":"ARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA","volume":"21 1","pages":"532"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2019.794n4006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For purposes of analysis and also to find meaning, much has been written about two intrinsically-linked terms: nationalism and the nation. The main positive consequence of this has been a vast theoretical debate about nationalism and the nation that undoubtedly enriches them. On the other hand, the main negative consequence is that development of the debate itself and its evolution have received little attention. The aim of this article is to show how this debate was constructed around the four classical paradigms of nationalism. To do this, the Kuhnian scheme is applied to determine when, how, and why these classical paradigms were articulated around these two terms. The main purpose of this is to delve into the historical explanation given by Moreno Almendral (2015), but from the philosophy of science, developing a much more detailed vision of the debate around nationalism and the nation.
通过库恩方案发展关于民族主义和民族主义的理论辩论
为了分析和寻找意义,人们写了很多关于两个内在联系的术语:民族主义和民族。这种情况的主要积极后果是关于民族主义和民族的广泛理论辩论,这无疑丰富了他们。另一方面,主要的消极后果是辩论本身的发展及其演变很少受到关注。本文的目的是展示这场辩论是如何围绕民族主义的四个经典范式构建的。为了做到这一点,应用Kuhnian方案来确定何时,如何以及为什么这些经典范式围绕这两个术语进行阐述。本文的主要目的是深入研究Moreno Almendral(2015)给出的历史解释,但从科学哲学的角度,对围绕民族主义和民族的辩论形成更详细的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA
ARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊介绍: Arbor is a bimonthly Journal publishing original articles on Science, Thought and Culture. By examining different topics with a rigorous scientific approach, Arbor intends to service the Spanish society and scientific community by providing information, updating, reflection and debate on subjects of current interest. Arbor is among the oldest Journals published by CSIC, and is open to researchers and Culture creators and managers, both Spanish and foreign.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信