M. Shetiwy, Ahmed M. Fareed, Magdy Basheer, Abdelrahman Albahy, A. Negm, Ashraf M. Shoma, Ashraf M Shoma
{"title":"Use of Tissue Adhesive Versus Staples for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic TAPP Inguinal Hernioplasty","authors":"M. Shetiwy, Ahmed M. Fareed, Magdy Basheer, Abdelrahman Albahy, A. Negm, Ashraf M. Shoma, Ashraf M Shoma","doi":"10.21614/sgo-500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is a remaining high debate, about mesh fixation involved in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) that is largely influenced by the individual preferences of each surgeon. In this research study, a comparison is done between mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) using either staples or tissue adhesive (Amcrylate). Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled study that was applied to 100 patients having an inguinal hernia. Patients included were randomly sorted into two groups based on the closed envelope method; Group I, involved 50 patients previously subjected to laparoscopic TAPP, and tissue adhesive was used for mesh fixation, and GroupII, involved 50 patients subjected to laparoscopic TAPP, and tackers were used for fixation of mesh. Results: We found a difference of statistical significance among the studied groups regarding the assessed VAS score on the 1st day (P=0.018), 10th day (P<0.001), and 30th days (P<0.001), post-operative with a difference that is not statistically significant pre-operative. The statistically analyzed difference among the studied groups was not significant regarding Carolina’s Comfort Scale after 6 months, Sensation of mesh, limitation of movement, recurrence, and complications. Conclusion: Mesh fixation using tissue adhesive is preferable to staples because of its association with less post-surgery accompanied pain, earlier return to work, no increase in prompt recurrence rates and complications, better chronic pain experience, and comparable life quality.","PeriodicalId":22101,"journal":{"name":"Surgery, Gastroenterology and Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery, Gastroenterology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/sgo-500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There is a remaining high debate, about mesh fixation involved in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) that is largely influenced by the individual preferences of each surgeon. In this research study, a comparison is done between mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) using either staples or tissue adhesive (Amcrylate). Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled study that was applied to 100 patients having an inguinal hernia. Patients included were randomly sorted into two groups based on the closed envelope method; Group I, involved 50 patients previously subjected to laparoscopic TAPP, and tissue adhesive was used for mesh fixation, and GroupII, involved 50 patients subjected to laparoscopic TAPP, and tackers were used for fixation of mesh. Results: We found a difference of statistical significance among the studied groups regarding the assessed VAS score on the 1st day (P=0.018), 10th day (P<0.001), and 30th days (P<0.001), post-operative with a difference that is not statistically significant pre-operative. The statistically analyzed difference among the studied groups was not significant regarding Carolina’s Comfort Scale after 6 months, Sensation of mesh, limitation of movement, recurrence, and complications. Conclusion: Mesh fixation using tissue adhesive is preferable to staples because of its association with less post-surgery accompanied pain, earlier return to work, no increase in prompt recurrence rates and complications, better chronic pain experience, and comparable life quality.
期刊介绍:
Starting with this issue "Annals of Fundeni Hospital", founded in 1996 as the scientific journal of the prestigious hospital Fundeni becomes "Journal of Translational Medicine and Research" (JTMR), an Journal of the Academy of Medical Sciences of Romania. Therefore, an 18 years old Journal, attested and indexed in Elsevier Bibliographic Databases, Amsterdam and also indexed in SCOPUS, is continuing a tradition of excellence that lasted almost two decades. The new title of the Journal is inspired first of all from the important developments of translational research In Fundeni Clinical Institute and the "C.C Iliescu Institute for Cardio-Vascular Diseases", in parallel with the national and international trend to promote and develop this important area or medical research. Although devoted mainly to translational research, JTMR will continue to promote both basic and clinical research.