Tef Yield Response to NPS Fertilizer and Methods of Sowing in East Shewa, Ethiopia

IF 0.7 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Wakjira Tesfahun
{"title":"Tef Yield Response to NPS Fertilizer and Methods of Sowing in East Shewa, Ethiopia","authors":"Wakjira Tesfahun","doi":"10.4038/jas.v13i2.8340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Soil fertility maintenance is a major concern in tropical Africa which needs to tackle soil fertility depletion as fundamental constraints. Similarly, the traditional way of planting tef reduces the amount of grain production, promotes competition for inputs and causes severe lodging. In this view, a study was to investigate the effect of sowing methods and NPS fertilizer application on tef production. Research method: A factorial experiment was laid out in RCBD with12 treatment combination and three replications at DebreZeit Agricultural Research Center. The first factor included six NPS fertilizer rates and the second factor included two methods of sowing. Relevant data were gathered and analyzed using SAS and mean difference were compared using LSD. Findings: The results of the study revealed that the analysis of variance among fertilizer rates and method of sowing showed significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) on almost all the tef characters tested. The shortest mean days to 50% panicle emergence (57.5) of teff were obtained from 120kg of NPS fertilizer. However, applied NPS fertilizer showed no significant difference on tef physiological maturity. The highest grain yield (3.77t ha-1), biomass yield (10.09 t ha-1) and straw yield (6.32 t ha-1) were recorded from combination of 120 kg NPS fertilizer and transplanting method. Blended fertilizer together with transplanting had improved the number of effective tiller and grain yield, biomass yield as well as straw yield. Therefore, 120 kg ha-1of NPS fertilizer and transplanting method can be suggested as one effective way to maximize grain yield of tef. Research Limitation: Further validation and demonstrations across multiple areas would be necessary to make conclusive recommendation since the experiment was conducted for sole season and site. Originality/Value: This study provides insights for farmers and stakeholders to incorporate blended fertilizer for soil fertility amendment and in encouraging of tef transplanting technology for boosting production.","PeriodicalId":41577,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/jas.v13i2.8340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Purpose: Soil fertility maintenance is a major concern in tropical Africa which needs to tackle soil fertility depletion as fundamental constraints. Similarly, the traditional way of planting tef reduces the amount of grain production, promotes competition for inputs and causes severe lodging. In this view, a study was to investigate the effect of sowing methods and NPS fertilizer application on tef production. Research method: A factorial experiment was laid out in RCBD with12 treatment combination and three replications at DebreZeit Agricultural Research Center. The first factor included six NPS fertilizer rates and the second factor included two methods of sowing. Relevant data were gathered and analyzed using SAS and mean difference were compared using LSD. Findings: The results of the study revealed that the analysis of variance among fertilizer rates and method of sowing showed significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) on almost all the tef characters tested. The shortest mean days to 50% panicle emergence (57.5) of teff were obtained from 120kg of NPS fertilizer. However, applied NPS fertilizer showed no significant difference on tef physiological maturity. The highest grain yield (3.77t ha-1), biomass yield (10.09 t ha-1) and straw yield (6.32 t ha-1) were recorded from combination of 120 kg NPS fertilizer and transplanting method. Blended fertilizer together with transplanting had improved the number of effective tiller and grain yield, biomass yield as well as straw yield. Therefore, 120 kg ha-1of NPS fertilizer and transplanting method can be suggested as one effective way to maximize grain yield of tef. Research Limitation: Further validation and demonstrations across multiple areas would be necessary to make conclusive recommendation since the experiment was conducted for sole season and site. Originality/Value: This study provides insights for farmers and stakeholders to incorporate blended fertilizer for soil fertility amendment and in encouraging of tef transplanting technology for boosting production.
埃塞俄比亚东谢瓦地区玉米产量对NPS肥料和播种方法的响应
目的:土壤肥力维持是热带非洲的一个主要问题,需要解决土壤肥力枯竭这一基本制约因素。同样,传统的tef种植方式减少了粮食产量,促进了对投入物的竞争,并造成了严重的倒伏。本研究旨在探讨不同播种方式和氮磷肥的施用对tef产量的影响。研究方法:在DebreZeit农业研究中心对RCBD进行了12个处理组合、3个重复的析因试验。第一个因素包括6种氮肥施肥量,第二个因素包括两种播种方式。收集相关资料,采用SAS分析,采用LSD比较均差。结果:施肥量和播种方式的方差分析表明,几乎所有tef性状均存在显著差异(P≤0.05)。120kg氮肥处理的苔麸平均出穗天数最短,为57.5天。施用NPS肥对tef生理成熟度无显著影响。120 kg氮磷肥与移栽方式配施的籽粒产量最高(3.77t ha-1),生物量产量最高(10.09 t ha-1),秸秆产量最高(6.32 t ha-1)。混肥配移栽提高了有效分蘖数、籽粒产量、生物量产量和秸秆产量。因此,建议施用120 kg hm -1氮磷肥和移栽方式是提高tef籽粒产量的有效途径之一。研究局限:由于实验是在单一季节和地点进行的,因此需要在多个领域进行进一步的验证和演示才能得出结论性建议。独创性/价值:本研究为农民和利益相关者提供了将混合肥料用于土壤肥力改良和鼓励tef移植技术提高产量的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Sciences
Journal of Agricultural Sciences AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信