Reimagining Qualitative Analysis and Writing via a Comparative Constructed Focus Group Method

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
E. Eger, A. Way
{"title":"Reimagining Qualitative Analysis and Writing via a Comparative Constructed Focus Group Method","authors":"E. Eger, A. Way","doi":"10.1525/dcqr.2020.9.3.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores our journey to a new comparative qualitative data analysis and writing method. In attempting to compare our separate qualitative youth work-life research, our analysis was stymied by traditional qualitative coding, writing conventions, and comparison norms. Our comparative research literature review revealed restrictions for our goals and ultimately inspired our new analysis and writing method called a “comparative constructed focus group.” We use a post-coding approach to connect participants in communication via a retrospectively constructed focus group and subsequent researcher dialogue. Our method enriches qualitative analysis and comparative writing by surfacing richer nuances and departures in participants’ communication and creates future potential for intersectional analysis.","PeriodicalId":36478,"journal":{"name":"Departures in Critical Qualitative Research","volume":"57 1","pages":"78-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Departures in Critical Qualitative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2020.9.3.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This essay explores our journey to a new comparative qualitative data analysis and writing method. In attempting to compare our separate qualitative youth work-life research, our analysis was stymied by traditional qualitative coding, writing conventions, and comparison norms. Our comparative research literature review revealed restrictions for our goals and ultimately inspired our new analysis and writing method called a “comparative constructed focus group.” We use a post-coding approach to connect participants in communication via a retrospectively constructed focus group and subsequent researcher dialogue. Our method enriches qualitative analysis and comparative writing by surfacing richer nuances and departures in participants’ communication and creates future potential for intersectional analysis.
通过比较建构焦点小组法重新构想定性分析与写作
本文探索了一种新的比较定性数据分析和写作方法。在试图比较我们单独的定性青年工作-生活研究时,我们的分析受到传统定性编码、写作惯例和比较规范的阻碍。我们的比较研究文献综述揭示了我们目标的局限性,并最终启发了我们新的分析和写作方法,称为“比较构建焦点小组”。我们使用后编码方法通过回顾性构建的焦点小组和随后的研究人员对话来连接交流中的参与者。我们的方法通过揭示参与者交流中更丰富的细微差别和差异,丰富了定性分析和比较写作,并为交叉分析创造了未来的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Departures in Critical Qualitative Research
Departures in Critical Qualitative Research Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信