Assessing Interobserver Agreement (IOA) with Procedural Integrity: Evaluation of Training Methods among Classroom Instructors

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Renee M. Hartz, Kaitlin M. Gould, Jill M. Harper, J. Luiselli
{"title":"Assessing Interobserver Agreement (IOA) with Procedural Integrity: Evaluation of Training Methods among Classroom Instructors","authors":"Renee M. Hartz, Kaitlin M. Gould, Jill M. Harper, J. Luiselli","doi":"10.1080/00168890.2020.1848404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study evaluated training methods to improve procedural integrity of classroom instructorswhen assessing interobserver agreement (IOA) with their students. Compared to baseline conditions in a multiple baseline across settings design, training that included a memo-task analysis review did not improve procedural integrity. Subsequent intervention consisting of single-session group administered behavioral skills training (BST: instruction, demonstration, role-playing, performance feedback) increased and stabilized procedural integrity of all instructors. These findings support previous training research concerned with procedural integrity of care providers and a competency-based approach towards improving IOA assessment.","PeriodicalId":46418,"journal":{"name":"Child & Family Behavior Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child & Family Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00168890.2020.1848404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluated training methods to improve procedural integrity of classroom instructorswhen assessing interobserver agreement (IOA) with their students. Compared to baseline conditions in a multiple baseline across settings design, training that included a memo-task analysis review did not improve procedural integrity. Subsequent intervention consisting of single-session group administered behavioral skills training (BST: instruction, demonstration, role-playing, performance feedback) increased and stabilized procedural integrity of all instructors. These findings support previous training research concerned with procedural integrity of care providers and a competency-based approach towards improving IOA assessment.
以程序完整性评估观察者间协议(IOA):课堂教师培训方法的评估
摘要本研究评估了课堂教师在评估与学生的观察者间协议(IOA)时提高程序完整性的培训方法。与多基线跨设置设计中的基线条件相比,包括备忘录任务分析审查的培训并没有提高程序完整性。随后的干预包括单次小组管理的行为技能训练(BST:指导、示范、角色扮演、表现反馈),增加并稳定了所有教师的程序完整性。这些发现支持了先前关于护理提供者程序完整性的培训研究,以及改进IOA评估的基于能力的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信