Inquiry into the Effectiveness of Eight Discipline-Based Problem-Solving

IF 1.8 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Matthew Barsalou, Marta Grabowska, R. Perkin
{"title":"Inquiry into the Effectiveness of Eight Discipline-Based Problem-Solving","authors":"Matthew Barsalou, Marta Grabowska, R. Perkin","doi":"10.12776/qip.v27i2.1839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The eight discipline (8D) report is a method for solving problems in industry and is based on an eight-step problem-solving process and is often called an 8D report. The 8D report has been covered in the literature; however, much of the literature on 8D reports only describes the use of 8D reports and fails to evaluate 8D reports empirically. The purpose of this research is to determine if the use of 8D reports combined with training within an organization leads to finding root causes more quickly.\nMethodology/Approach: The research uses a mixed-methods approach. A case study describes the implementation of 8D reports in a manufacturing organization in the automotive industry. The paper then looks at five years’ worth of data after the implementation of an 8D-based process for addressing quality problems and determined if there is a significant difference in the time to find root causes after the implementation of 8D reports combined with training.\nFindings: The research found that the time to solve problems was reduced between the early and later years after the implementation of an 8D process and related training. Faster problem resolution means resources can be redirected elsewhere, as well as a reduction in scrap or rework.\nResearch Limitation/Implication: The paper only looked at the use of 8D reports in the case study organization.\nOriginality/Value of paper: This paper provides evidence supporting the effectiveness of 8D reports as an approach to problem-solving. The case study aspect also provides guidance for managers seeking to implement 8D reports in their organizations.","PeriodicalId":44057,"journal":{"name":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v27i2.1839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The eight discipline (8D) report is a method for solving problems in industry and is based on an eight-step problem-solving process and is often called an 8D report. The 8D report has been covered in the literature; however, much of the literature on 8D reports only describes the use of 8D reports and fails to evaluate 8D reports empirically. The purpose of this research is to determine if the use of 8D reports combined with training within an organization leads to finding root causes more quickly. Methodology/Approach: The research uses a mixed-methods approach. A case study describes the implementation of 8D reports in a manufacturing organization in the automotive industry. The paper then looks at five years’ worth of data after the implementation of an 8D-based process for addressing quality problems and determined if there is a significant difference in the time to find root causes after the implementation of 8D reports combined with training. Findings: The research found that the time to solve problems was reduced between the early and later years after the implementation of an 8D process and related training. Faster problem resolution means resources can be redirected elsewhere, as well as a reduction in scrap or rework. Research Limitation/Implication: The paper only looked at the use of 8D reports in the case study organization. Originality/Value of paper: This paper provides evidence supporting the effectiveness of 8D reports as an approach to problem-solving. The case study aspect also provides guidance for managers seeking to implement 8D reports in their organizations.
八项基于学科的问题解决的有效性探讨
目的:八学科(8D)报告是一种解决行业问题的方法,基于八步解决问题的过程,通常被称为8D报告。8D报告已经在文献中被提及;然而,许多关于8D报告的文献只描述了8D报告的使用,并没有对8D报告进行经验性的评估。本研究的目的是确定将8D报告与组织内的培训相结合是否可以更快地找到根本原因。方法论/方法:本研究采用混合方法。一个案例研究描述了在汽车行业的制造组织中8D报告的实现。然后,本文查看了在实施基于8D的流程来解决质量问题后的五年数据,并确定在实施8D报告与培训相结合后,在寻找根本原因的时间上是否存在显着差异。研究结果:研究发现,在实施8D流程和相关培训后的早期和后期,解决问题的时间缩短了。更快地解决问题意味着资源可以被重新分配到其他地方,同时也减少了废品或返工。研究局限/启示:本文只研究了案例研究组织中8D报告的使用。论文的原创性/价值:本文提供证据支持8D报告作为解决问题方法的有效性。案例研究方面还为寻求在其组织中实施8D报告的管理人员提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信