THE GEOPOLITICS OF CANADIAN DEFENSE WHITE PAPERS: LOFTY RHETORIC AND LIMITED RESULTS

Q1 Arts and Humanities
B. Chapman
{"title":"THE GEOPOLITICS OF CANADIAN DEFENSE WHITE PAPERS: LOFTY RHETORIC AND LIMITED RESULTS","authors":"B. Chapman","doi":"10.22381/GHIR11120191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the United States northern neighbor, Canada serves as a NATO ally and a strategic partner with Washington through the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD). Canadian forces have fought honorably and bravely in concert with American forces in many wars. Canada’s Government, however, has been less consistent in promoting a credible vision of Canadian national security policy and geopolitical interests in its defense white papers. These documents have often contained idealistic rhetoric about adhering to a rules-based international order and defending freedom. In reality, Canadian governments of varying political parties have consistently failed to provide the sustained funding and coherent national security strategy to make Ottawa an effective partner with the U.S. and the NATO alliance in addressing historical and emerging national security threats. This article examines Canadian defense white papers for several decades and recommends ways Canada can ensure its defense policy planning can have greater credibility in the national security policymaking corridors of its allies and with potential adversaries.","PeriodicalId":37543,"journal":{"name":"Geopolitics, History, and International Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geopolitics, History, and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22381/GHIR11120191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the United States northern neighbor, Canada serves as a NATO ally and a strategic partner with Washington through the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD). Canadian forces have fought honorably and bravely in concert with American forces in many wars. Canada’s Government, however, has been less consistent in promoting a credible vision of Canadian national security policy and geopolitical interests in its defense white papers. These documents have often contained idealistic rhetoric about adhering to a rules-based international order and defending freedom. In reality, Canadian governments of varying political parties have consistently failed to provide the sustained funding and coherent national security strategy to make Ottawa an effective partner with the U.S. and the NATO alliance in addressing historical and emerging national security threats. This article examines Canadian defense white papers for several decades and recommends ways Canada can ensure its defense policy planning can have greater credibility in the national security policymaking corridors of its allies and with potential adversaries.
加拿大国防白皮书的地缘政治:高谈阔论,结果有限
作为美国的北部邻国,加拿大通过北美航空航天防御司令部(NORAD)担任北约盟友和华盛顿的战略伙伴。加拿大军队在许多战争中与美国军队并肩作战,光荣而勇敢。然而,加拿大政府在其国防白皮书中促进加拿大国家安全政策和地缘政治利益的可信愿景方面一直不那么一致。这些文件往往包含坚持以规则为基础的国际秩序和捍卫自由的理想主义言论。实际上,加拿大不同政党的政府一直未能提供持续的资金和连贯的国家安全战略,以使渥太华成为美国和北约联盟在应对历史和新出现的国家安全威胁方面的有效伙伴。本文研究了加拿大几十年来的国防白皮书,并建议加拿大如何确保其国防政策规划在其盟国和潜在对手的国家安全政策制定走廊中具有更大的可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Geopolitics, History, and International Relations publishes mainly original empirical research and review articles focusing on hot emerging topics, e.g. digital diplomacy, online political participation, data activism, fake social media news, algorithmic governance, computational politics, Internet terrorism, autonomous weapons systems, virtual history, innovative data-driven smart urban ecosystems, etc. This journal considers only manuscripts having a high integrative value in the current Scopus- and Web of Science-indexed literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信