Review of international practice of health care provider network planning

Q3 Medicine
V. Omelyanovskiy, D. Lukyantseva, N. Sisigina
{"title":"Review of international practice of health care provider network planning","authors":"V. Omelyanovskiy, D. Lukyantseva, N. Sisigina","doi":"10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2022.148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objevtive: to identify and systematize the main approaches to planning health care provider network used in foreign countries.Material and methods. Preliminary search for countries who had an experience of systematical planning of health care provider network and tools that they used for planning was conducted in regular health system reviews made by the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Identified tools became a subject of general Internet search for the official publications about goals, mechanisms and results of their usage. The findings were analysed to reveal the similarities and differences between national health care provider network planning policies as well as the objective preconditions for the formation of such policies.Results. Three main approaches to health care provider network planning were identified in the analysis: (1) through establishing state-owned health care providers, (2) through granting the right to deliver guaranteed health care or (3) through granting the right to deliver health care of all categories. A close relationship between the choice of prevailing approach to planning and specific planning tools and the national health care model and structure of health services supply was shown. The typical policy of countries most similar to Russia on these parameters (“young” insurance systems, operating under conditions of predominant state supply of medical services) is the protection of key providers on the basis of minimum activity or income guarantees with the gradual development of a competitive health care market based on the rest of the Compulsory Health Insurance program.Conclusion. Current Russian health care provider network planning regulation based on the direct control over the state-owned health care providers does not correspond to the changed health care model and does not allow taking full advantages of the social health insurance. The results of the review can be used to develop new tools for planning health care provider network spanning on non-state providers.","PeriodicalId":36464,"journal":{"name":"Farmakoekonomika","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmakoekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2022.148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objevtive: to identify and systematize the main approaches to planning health care provider network used in foreign countries.Material and methods. Preliminary search for countries who had an experience of systematical planning of health care provider network and tools that they used for planning was conducted in regular health system reviews made by the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Identified tools became a subject of general Internet search for the official publications about goals, mechanisms and results of their usage. The findings were analysed to reveal the similarities and differences between national health care provider network planning policies as well as the objective preconditions for the formation of such policies.Results. Three main approaches to health care provider network planning were identified in the analysis: (1) through establishing state-owned health care providers, (2) through granting the right to deliver guaranteed health care or (3) through granting the right to deliver health care of all categories. A close relationship between the choice of prevailing approach to planning and specific planning tools and the national health care model and structure of health services supply was shown. The typical policy of countries most similar to Russia on these parameters (“young” insurance systems, operating under conditions of predominant state supply of medical services) is the protection of key providers on the basis of minimum activity or income guarantees with the gradual development of a competitive health care market based on the rest of the Compulsory Health Insurance program.Conclusion. Current Russian health care provider network planning regulation based on the direct control over the state-owned health care providers does not correspond to the changed health care model and does not allow taking full advantages of the social health insurance. The results of the review can be used to develop new tools for planning health care provider network spanning on non-state providers.
卫生保健提供者网络规划的国际实践综述
目的:对国外医疗服务提供者网络规划的主要方法进行梳理和归纳。材料和方法。在欧洲卫生系统和政策观察站进行的定期卫生系统审查中,对具有系统规划卫生保健提供者网络经验的国家及其用于规划的工具进行了初步搜索。已确定的工具成为Internet上关于其使用目标、机制和结果的官方出版物的一般搜索主题。通过对研究结果的分析,揭示了不同国家医疗服务提供者网络规划政策的异同,以及这些政策形成的客观前提。在分析中确定了卫生保健提供者网络规划的三种主要方法:(1)通过建立国有卫生保健提供者,(2)通过授予提供有保障的卫生保健的权利,或(3)通过授予提供所有类别卫生保健的权利。报告显示,选择流行的规划方法和具体规划工具与国家保健模式和保健服务供应结构之间存在密切关系。在这些参数(“年轻的”保险制度,在国家主要提供医疗服务的条件下运作)上与俄罗斯最相似的国家的典型政策是在最低活动或收入保障的基础上保护主要提供者,并在强制性医疗保险计划的其余部分的基础上逐步发展竞争性医疗保健市场。目前俄罗斯基于对国有卫生保健提供者直接控制的卫生保健提供者网络规划条例不符合改变后的卫生保健模式,也不允许充分利用社会健康保险。审查的结果可用于开发新的工具,以规划跨越非国家提供者的卫生保健提供者网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Farmakoekonomika
Farmakoekonomika Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信