Activity of preserved anaerobic sludge

Anna Doloman, R. Sims, C. D. Miller
{"title":"Activity of preserved anaerobic sludge","authors":"Anna Doloman, R. Sims, C. D. Miller","doi":"10.1080/10934529.2019.1668654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There is a need for a broad study addressing different preservation conditions of anaerobic sludge and its activity after a prolonged storage. This study compared four different preservation methods of mesophilic anaerobic sludge for a period of up to 12 months: storage at 23 ± 2 °C, +4 °C, ‒20 °C, and freeze-dried. Anaerobic sludge was sampled from upper and bottom ports of an up flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor fed with microalgae and sodium acetate at organic loading rate of 5.4 gCOD/L·d. Specific methanogenic activity (SMA) tests were performed on the sludge samples after 2.5, 6, and 12 months of storage. Results demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in the SMA of the bottom port preserved sludge, but not of the upper port sludge, regardless of the method used for preservation. A varying susceptibility to the storage of the two types of the anaerobic sludge can be explained by the content of the methanogenic microorganisms, with bottom port sludge having a higher amount of the methane producing species. Interestingly, lyophilized samples were able to produce similar amounts of biogas when compared to the other three storage conditions, with the only difference of having a longer re-activation period.","PeriodicalId":15733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","volume":"4 1","pages":"119 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2019.1668654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract There is a need for a broad study addressing different preservation conditions of anaerobic sludge and its activity after a prolonged storage. This study compared four different preservation methods of mesophilic anaerobic sludge for a period of up to 12 months: storage at 23 ± 2 °C, +4 °C, ‒20 °C, and freeze-dried. Anaerobic sludge was sampled from upper and bottom ports of an up flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor fed with microalgae and sodium acetate at organic loading rate of 5.4 gCOD/L·d. Specific methanogenic activity (SMA) tests were performed on the sludge samples after 2.5, 6, and 12 months of storage. Results demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in the SMA of the bottom port preserved sludge, but not of the upper port sludge, regardless of the method used for preservation. A varying susceptibility to the storage of the two types of the anaerobic sludge can be explained by the content of the methanogenic microorganisms, with bottom port sludge having a higher amount of the methane producing species. Interestingly, lyophilized samples were able to produce similar amounts of biogas when compared to the other three storage conditions, with the only difference of having a longer re-activation period.
保存厌氧污泥的活性
有必要对厌氧污泥的不同保存条件及其长期储存后的活性进行广泛的研究。本研究比较了中温厌氧污泥长达12个月的四种不同保存方法:23±2°C、+4°C、-20°C和冻干。以微藻和乙酸钠为原料,以5.4 gCOD/L·d的有机负荷率,从上流式厌氧污泥毯反应器(UASB)的上下两个端口取样厌氧污泥。在储存2.5个月、6个月和12个月后,对污泥样品进行了特定产甲烷活性(SMA)测试。结果显示,无论采用何种保存方法,底部港口保存的污泥的SMA在统计上显着降低,但在上部港口污泥中没有。对两种类型厌氧污泥储存的不同敏感性可以通过产甲烷微生物的含量来解释,底部港口污泥具有更高数量的产甲烷物种。有趣的是,与其他三种储存条件相比,冻干样品能够产生相似数量的沼气,唯一的区别是具有更长的再激活期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信