Who Reads What Most Often?: A Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Literature Read by Risk Executives

J. Fraser, Karen Schoening-Thiessen, B. Simkins
{"title":"Who Reads What Most Often?: A Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Literature Read by Risk Executives","authors":"J. Fraser, Karen Schoening-Thiessen, B. Simkins","doi":"10.1002/9781118267080.CH22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study provides the results of a survey on the most important risk literature read by executives working in the area of enterprise risk management, and it highlights excellent opportunities for academics to closely collaborate with practitioners to conduct research in these key areas of need. We discuss problems and challenges risk executives have encountered that were not addressed in the literature. Overall, the key findings of our survey are as follows: First, surprisingly, COSO (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission) was not considered a key source of information and guidance. Second, major challenges still remain for new implementers. Third, much more work is needed in the areas of research and case studies so that risk executives can learn from the experiences of others who have successfully implemented enterprise risk management. Fourth, many areas clearly remain to be explored and discussed before a common understanding or methodology for enterprise risk management could be considered to be in place; and fifth, we find that experienced risk executives are not only much more familiar with the literature, but they also find publications about ‘risk in general’ very useful at early and advanced stages of enterprise risk management implementation.","PeriodicalId":43299,"journal":{"name":"JASSA-The Finsia Journal of Applied Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JASSA-The Finsia Journal of Applied Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118267080.CH22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

This study provides the results of a survey on the most important risk literature read by executives working in the area of enterprise risk management, and it highlights excellent opportunities for academics to closely collaborate with practitioners to conduct research in these key areas of need. We discuss problems and challenges risk executives have encountered that were not addressed in the literature. Overall, the key findings of our survey are as follows: First, surprisingly, COSO (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission) was not considered a key source of information and guidance. Second, major challenges still remain for new implementers. Third, much more work is needed in the areas of research and case studies so that risk executives can learn from the experiences of others who have successfully implemented enterprise risk management. Fourth, many areas clearly remain to be explored and discussed before a common understanding or methodology for enterprise risk management could be considered to be in place; and fifth, we find that experienced risk executives are not only much more familiar with the literature, but they also find publications about ‘risk in general’ very useful at early and advanced stages of enterprise risk management implementation.
谁最常读什么?:风险主管阅读的企业风险管理文献调查
本研究提供了对企业风险管理领域高管阅读的最重要风险文献的调查结果,并强调了学术界与从业者密切合作,在这些关键领域开展研究的绝佳机会。我们讨论了风险管理人员遇到的问题和挑战,这些问题和挑战在文献中没有提到。总体而言,我们调查的主要发现如下:首先,令人惊讶的是,COSO(特雷德韦委员会的赞助组织委员会)没有被认为是信息和指导的关键来源。第二,新实现者仍然面临主要挑战。第三,在研究和案例研究领域需要做更多的工作,以便风险管理人员可以从成功实施企业风险管理的其他人的经验中学习。第四,在企业风险管理的共同理解或方法可以被认为到位之前,许多领域显然仍有待探索和讨论;第五,我们发现经验丰富的风险管理人员不仅更熟悉文献,而且他们还发现关于“一般风险”的出版物在企业风险管理实施的早期和后期阶段非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信