Validation of anthropometric equations for predicting body mass and height in older women

Q4 Medicine
Gilberto Moreira Santos Júnior, A. A. R. Geraldes, Dante Wanderley Lima de Oliveira, Piettra Moura Galvão Pereira, R. B. D. Albuquerque
{"title":"Validation of anthropometric equations for predicting body mass and height in older women","authors":"Gilberto Moreira Santos Júnior, A. A. R. Geraldes, Dante Wanderley Lima de Oliveira, Piettra Moura Galvão Pereira, R. B. D. Albuquerque","doi":"10.1590/1980-0037.2021V23E77985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract To investigate the cross-validity of two equations widely used in national research to predict body mass and height in older Brazilians. Additionally, the importance of possible differences between observed and predicted BMI will be investigated with the help of equations. BM and HEI were measured using mechanical scales and portable stadiometers in a sample of 200 older women (66.6 ± 5.43 years) living in Maceió / AL - Brazil. To verify the validity of equations, the following variables were used: Student's t-test, constant error (CE), total error (TE) and standard error of estimation (SEE). To verify agreement between actual and predicted values, the Bland-Altman test was used. The comparison between BM and HEI values obtained through equations and those verified in measurements showed statistically significant differences (p <0.05). CE between predicted and measured values, TE of tested equations, as well as SEE for the prediction of variables: BM (1.66; 0.11 and 6.33), HEI (-0.02; 0.02 and 0.10) and BMI (1.47; 0.10 and 3.24) allowed determining relative values very close to actual ones (2.6%, 1.31% and 5.3% for BM, HEI and BMI respectively); however, values were not statistically significant. The equations analyzed should not be used in a general way for the population of older Brazilian women with characteristics similar to those analyzed in this study. Therefore, further studies should be carried out with the objective of constructing specific equations for the population of older women and hospitalized patients, especially the most fragile ones.","PeriodicalId":38989,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2021V23E77985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract To investigate the cross-validity of two equations widely used in national research to predict body mass and height in older Brazilians. Additionally, the importance of possible differences between observed and predicted BMI will be investigated with the help of equations. BM and HEI were measured using mechanical scales and portable stadiometers in a sample of 200 older women (66.6 ± 5.43 years) living in Maceió / AL - Brazil. To verify the validity of equations, the following variables were used: Student's t-test, constant error (CE), total error (TE) and standard error of estimation (SEE). To verify agreement between actual and predicted values, the Bland-Altman test was used. The comparison between BM and HEI values obtained through equations and those verified in measurements showed statistically significant differences (p <0.05). CE between predicted and measured values, TE of tested equations, as well as SEE for the prediction of variables: BM (1.66; 0.11 and 6.33), HEI (-0.02; 0.02 and 0.10) and BMI (1.47; 0.10 and 3.24) allowed determining relative values very close to actual ones (2.6%, 1.31% and 5.3% for BM, HEI and BMI respectively); however, values were not statistically significant. The equations analyzed should not be used in a general way for the population of older Brazilian women with characteristics similar to those analyzed in this study. Therefore, further studies should be carried out with the objective of constructing specific equations for the population of older women and hospitalized patients, especially the most fragile ones.
预测老年妇女体重和身高的人体测量方程的验证
摘要:探讨在巴西国家研究中广泛使用的预测老年人体重和身高的两个方程的交叉效度。此外,观察到的BMI和预测的BMI之间可能存在的差异的重要性将在方程的帮助下进行研究。采用机械秤和便携式体重计对居住在Maceió / AL -巴西的200名老年妇女(66.6±5.43岁)的BM和HEI进行测量。为了验证方程的有效性,使用了以下变量:学生t检验、常数误差(CE)、总误差(TE)和估计的标准误差(SEE)。为了验证实际值和预测值之间的一致性,使用了Bland-Altman检验。公式计算的BM和HEI值与实测验证值比较,差异有统计学意义(p <0.05)。预测值与实测值之间的CE,检验方程的TE,以及变量预测的SEE: BM (1.66;0.11和6.33),HEI (-0.02;0.02和0.10)和BMI (1.47;0.10和3.24)允许确定非常接近实际值的相对值(BMI、HEI和BMI分别为2.6%、1.31%和5.3%);然而,数值没有统计学意义。所分析的方程不应以一般方式用于具有与本研究中分析的特征相似的巴西老年妇女人群。因此,应开展进一步的研究,目的是为老年妇女和住院病人,特别是最脆弱的病人建立具体的方程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance is a journal of Physical Education, Kinesiology, Sport and related areas, whose focus is human movement, being reviewed by an international panel of peers, with emphasis on the measurement of the man in its morphological and functional aspects, as well as conditioning factors of physical performance. Given the multidisciplinary nature of the journal, these areas of study are approached in several contexts, with interactions with social, behavioral, health and environmental aspects. The journal publishes original articles as well as relevant Review/Update articles and Points of View.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信