Development and Validation of Elements for the Construction Risk Maturity Assessment (CRMA)

Q1 Social Sciences
Anthony J. Perrenoud, Emmilea Short, Deron Cowan
{"title":"Development and Validation of Elements for the Construction Risk Maturity Assessment (CRMA)","authors":"Anthony J. Perrenoud, Emmilea Short, Deron Cowan","doi":"10.1080/15578771.2021.1958959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Construction organizations should always look for areas of improvement. Managing risk effectively on construction projects demonstrates expertise, improves customer satisfaction, and increases the likelihood for future work with the client. Construction organizations can improve risk management by measuring their perceptions and practices with identifying, analyzing, and managing risk, also known as risk maturity. Effective measurements will lead to the identification of strengths and weaknesses and can lead to improved performance. Risk Maturity Models (RMM) have been developed in the past to measure risk management practices and perceptions. These previous RMMs were developed in industries outside of construction management. This study aimed to validate the necessary elements for measuring construction risk maturity with industry risk management experts. A three-round Delphi method study was conducted with 28 construction risk management practitioners. The study resulted in a consensus of the key elements for measuring risk maturity. Twenty-five elements were identified and ranked in order of importance. New elements with risk maturity were identified in this study that were not observed in previous RMMs and are unique to the construction industry. All elements were combined to develop the Construction Risk Maturity Assessment (CRMA) for measuring and improving risk maturity in construction organizations.","PeriodicalId":39782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Construction Education and Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"42 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Construction Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2021.1958959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Construction organizations should always look for areas of improvement. Managing risk effectively on construction projects demonstrates expertise, improves customer satisfaction, and increases the likelihood for future work with the client. Construction organizations can improve risk management by measuring their perceptions and practices with identifying, analyzing, and managing risk, also known as risk maturity. Effective measurements will lead to the identification of strengths and weaknesses and can lead to improved performance. Risk Maturity Models (RMM) have been developed in the past to measure risk management practices and perceptions. These previous RMMs were developed in industries outside of construction management. This study aimed to validate the necessary elements for measuring construction risk maturity with industry risk management experts. A three-round Delphi method study was conducted with 28 construction risk management practitioners. The study resulted in a consensus of the key elements for measuring risk maturity. Twenty-five elements were identified and ranked in order of importance. New elements with risk maturity were identified in this study that were not observed in previous RMMs and are unique to the construction industry. All elements were combined to develop the Construction Risk Maturity Assessment (CRMA) for measuring and improving risk maturity in construction organizations.
建设项目风险成熟度评价要素的开发与验证
施工组织应该不断寻找改进的地方。有效地管理建筑项目的风险可以展示专业知识,提高客户满意度,并增加未来与客户合作的可能性。施工组织可以通过测量他们的感知和实践来改进风险管理,包括识别、分析和管理风险,也称为风险成熟度。有效的测量将导致优势和劣势的识别,并可能导致改进绩效。风险成熟度模型(RMM)在过去被开发用来度量风险管理实践和认知。这些以前的rmm是在建筑管理之外的行业中开发的。本研究旨在与行业风险管理专家共同验证衡量建筑风险成熟度的必要要素。对28名建筑风险管理从业人员进行了三轮德尔菲法研究。该研究对衡量风险成熟度的关键要素达成了共识。确定了25个要素,并按重要性排序。本研究确定了具有风险成熟度的新元素,这些元素在以前的rmm中没有观察到,并且是建筑业所独有的。将所有要素结合起来,开发了施工风险成熟度评估(CRMA),用于测量和改进施工组织的风险成熟度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Construction Education and Research is a respected international refereed journal that publishes original works that address cutting edge issues related to construction around the globe. The Journal supports the mission of the Associated Schools of Construction (ASC), a professional association comprised of about 100 universities and colleges. The ASC encourages the sharing of ideas and knowledge and promotes excellence in curricula, teaching, research and service relating to the construction industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信