Effects of Multibracket Orthodontic Treatment versus Clear Aligners on Periodontal Health: An Integrative Review

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Aaron Jacob David Partouche, Filipe Castro, A. Baptista, L. Costa, Juliana Campos Hasse Fernandes, G. V. O. Fernandes
{"title":"Effects of Multibracket Orthodontic Treatment versus Clear Aligners on Periodontal Health: An Integrative Review","authors":"Aaron Jacob David Partouche, Filipe Castro, A. Baptista, L. Costa, Juliana Campos Hasse Fernandes, G. V. O. Fernandes","doi":"10.3390/dj10100177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This integrative review aimed to identify studies comparing the periodontal health in patients wearing multibracket orthodontic appliances and clear aligners. Materials and methods: An integrative literature search was performed through different databases, PubMed/Medline, PMC, and the Cochrane Library. This work was submitted to a search strategy following the PICO method and included the focus question: “Could the chosen orthodontic appliance change significantly the oral hygiene of the patient, impairing the periodontal health?” This work included analytical and controlled studies on humans published between 2005 and 2020, in the English language, establishing a comparison of the periodontal status in patients undergoing orthodontic multibracket and clear aligners therapies. The main periodontal indexes assessed were plaque index (PI), pocket depth (PD), gingival index (GI), and bleeding on probing (BoP). Results: The electronic research displayed 386 articles on PMC, 106 on PubMed, and 40 on the Cochrane Library. After removal, just 25 articles were selected for full-text screening, but just eight studies were eligible for this integrative review. It was enumerated that 204 patients were treated with aligners and 294 with multibracket orthodontic appliances, mainly elastomeric ligated brackets. Only the plaque index displayed a significant difference between the two groups and general data obtained showed a better control for periodontal health in the clear aligners. Limitations such as age, malocclusion severity, therapeutic choice, and different time measure was observed. In addition, the oral hygiene instruction and follow-up by a professional were different, and the role of malocclusion was not present in the studies. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, better results for periodontal health were found in the clear aligners. Therefore, more studies are necessary to affirm that aligners are synonymous with better gingival conditions in comparison with multibracket appliances. Other variables such as oral hygiene instructions, motivation, and supportive treatment tend to be more prevalent than the type of appliance itself in the periodontal evaluation.","PeriodicalId":47284,"journal":{"name":"Open Dentistry Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10100177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: This integrative review aimed to identify studies comparing the periodontal health in patients wearing multibracket orthodontic appliances and clear aligners. Materials and methods: An integrative literature search was performed through different databases, PubMed/Medline, PMC, and the Cochrane Library. This work was submitted to a search strategy following the PICO method and included the focus question: “Could the chosen orthodontic appliance change significantly the oral hygiene of the patient, impairing the periodontal health?” This work included analytical and controlled studies on humans published between 2005 and 2020, in the English language, establishing a comparison of the periodontal status in patients undergoing orthodontic multibracket and clear aligners therapies. The main periodontal indexes assessed were plaque index (PI), pocket depth (PD), gingival index (GI), and bleeding on probing (BoP). Results: The electronic research displayed 386 articles on PMC, 106 on PubMed, and 40 on the Cochrane Library. After removal, just 25 articles were selected for full-text screening, but just eight studies were eligible for this integrative review. It was enumerated that 204 patients were treated with aligners and 294 with multibracket orthodontic appliances, mainly elastomeric ligated brackets. Only the plaque index displayed a significant difference between the two groups and general data obtained showed a better control for periodontal health in the clear aligners. Limitations such as age, malocclusion severity, therapeutic choice, and different time measure was observed. In addition, the oral hygiene instruction and follow-up by a professional were different, and the role of malocclusion was not present in the studies. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, better results for periodontal health were found in the clear aligners. Therefore, more studies are necessary to affirm that aligners are synonymous with better gingival conditions in comparison with multibracket appliances. Other variables such as oral hygiene instructions, motivation, and supportive treatment tend to be more prevalent than the type of appliance itself in the periodontal evaluation.
多托槽正畸治疗与透明矫正器对牙周健康的影响:一项综合综述
目的:本综合综述旨在确定研究比较多托槽正畸矫治器和透明矫正器患者的牙周健康。材料和方法:通过不同的数据库PubMed/Medline、PMC和Cochrane图书馆进行综合文献检索。这项工作提交给PICO方法后的搜索策略,并包括焦点问题:“所选择的正畸器具是否会显著改变患者的口腔卫生,损害牙周健康?”这项工作包括2005年至2020年间发表的人类分析和对照研究,以英语发表,建立了接受多支架正畸和透明矫正器治疗的患者牙周状况的比较。评估的主要牙周指标为菌斑指数(PI)、牙袋深度(PD)、牙龈指数(GI)和探诊出血(BoP)。结果:PMC收录386篇,PubMed收录106篇,Cochrane Library收录40篇。删除后,只有25篇文章被选中进行全文筛选,但只有8项研究符合这项综合评价的条件。经点算,使用矫正器204例,多托槽矫治器294例,以弹性结扎托槽为主。只有菌斑指数在两组之间显示出显著差异,获得的一般数据表明,使用清洁矫正器对牙周健康有更好的控制。观察年龄、错牙合严重程度、治疗选择、不同时间测量等局限性。此外,口腔卫生的指导和专业人员的随访是不同的,并且在研究中没有出现错牙合的作用。结论:在本研究的限制范围内,发现透明矫正器对牙周健康有更好的效果。因此,需要更多的研究来证实,与多支架矫治器相比,矫正器是更好的牙龈状况的代名词。在牙周评估中,其他变量如口腔卫生指导、动机和支持性治疗往往比矫治器本身的类型更普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Dentistry Journal
Open Dentistry Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信