The Uses and Misuses of the Secret Communist Police Files: The Notorious Securitate`s Archives in the Postcommunist Era

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Claudia-Florentina Dobre
{"title":"The Uses and Misuses of the Secret Communist Police Files: The Notorious Securitate`s Archives in the Postcommunist Era","authors":"Claudia-Florentina Dobre","doi":"10.37708/bf.swu.v31i2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On December 7, 1999, the Law no. 187, on access to one’s own file and the disclosure of Securitate as a political police, was adopted by the Romanian Parliament. The law established the creation of an institution (Consiliul Național pentru Studierea Arhivelor Securității-The National Council for the Study of Securitate Archives-CNSAS) whose mission is to collect all documents issued by the former Communist Secret Police (the notorious Securitate) and made them available to the researchers and the larger audience upon request as well as to reveal the agents of the repression. My article deals with the creation, its functionning, and the controversies which surrounded this institution from 2000 onwards. I argue that the archive of the Securitate was instrumentalized by various actors of the public space in their struggle for power, namely for controlling the cultural, economic, and political fields of power (les champs du pouvoir) and did not accomplish its mission to reveal the agents of the repression. Furthermore, the disclosure of the collaboration with the former political police of various anticommunist public figures (former political detainees, deportees, dissidents) transfered the responsability for the communist crimes from the main actors of the repression (namely the Securitate officers) to the victims, blamed for their collaboration.","PeriodicalId":40507,"journal":{"name":"Balkanistic Forum","volume":"39 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balkanistic Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37708/bf.swu.v31i2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On December 7, 1999, the Law no. 187, on access to one’s own file and the disclosure of Securitate as a political police, was adopted by the Romanian Parliament. The law established the creation of an institution (Consiliul Național pentru Studierea Arhivelor Securității-The National Council for the Study of Securitate Archives-CNSAS) whose mission is to collect all documents issued by the former Communist Secret Police (the notorious Securitate) and made them available to the researchers and the larger audience upon request as well as to reveal the agents of the repression. My article deals with the creation, its functionning, and the controversies which surrounded this institution from 2000 onwards. I argue that the archive of the Securitate was instrumentalized by various actors of the public space in their struggle for power, namely for controlling the cultural, economic, and political fields of power (les champs du pouvoir) and did not accomplish its mission to reveal the agents of the repression. Furthermore, the disclosure of the collaboration with the former political police of various anticommunist public figures (former political detainees, deportees, dissidents) transfered the responsability for the communist crimes from the main actors of the repression (namely the Securitate officers) to the victims, blamed for their collaboration.
共产党秘密警察档案的使用与滥用:后共产主义时代臭名昭著的安全档案
1999年12月7日,第罗马尼亚议会通过了第187条关于查阅个人档案和揭露Securitate作为政治警察的规定。该法律规定设立一个机构(Consiliul Național pentru Studierea archivelor Securității-The国家安全档案研究委员会),其任务是收集前共产党秘密警察(臭名昭著的安全机构)发布的所有文件,并应要求向研究人员和广大读者提供这些文件,同时揭露镇压的代理人。我的文章论述了这个机构的创立、运作以及自2000年以来围绕它的争议。我认为,Securitate的档案被公共空间的各种行动者用作权力斗争的工具,即控制权力的文化、经济和政治领域(les champs du pouvoir),并没有完成其揭示镇压代理人的使命。此外,揭露与各种反共公众人物(前政治犯、被驱逐者、持不同政见者)的前政治警察的合作,将对共产主义罪行的责任从镇压的主要行动者(即安全机构官员)转移到受害者身上,归咎于他们的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Balkanistic Forum
Balkanistic Forum HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: "Balkanistic Forum" is published since 1992 as a yearly edition of the “Seminar for Balkan Studies and Specialization” to the South-Western University “Neofyt Rilski” Blagoevgrad. Since 1995 it is published in thematic issues -3 issues per year. The main task of the Journal is to provide free forum for discussing important historical and present problems of the Balkans in European and wider context. It is designed as an interdisciplinary journal uniting the efforts of specialists in History, Sociology, Literature, Anthropology, Linguistics, Culture Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信