DIÁRIOS DE APRENDIZAGEM COMO INSTRUMENTO DE PROMOÇÃO DO PENSAMENTO METACOGNITIVO: UMA DISCUSSÃO SOB A VISÃO DOS SUJEITOS ENVOLVIDOS / LEARNING DIARIES AS AN INSTRUMENT TO PROMOTE METACOGNITIVE THINKING: A DISCUSSION UNDER THE VIEW OF THE SUBJECTS INVOLVED

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Camila Boszko, C. T. W. Rosa
{"title":"DIÁRIOS DE APRENDIZAGEM COMO INSTRUMENTO DE PROMOÇÃO DO PENSAMENTO METACOGNITIVO: UMA DISCUSSÃO SOB A VISÃO DOS SUJEITOS ENVOLVIDOS / LEARNING DIARIES AS AN INSTRUMENT TO PROMOTE METACOGNITIVE THINKING: A DISCUSSION UNDER THE VIEW OF THE SUBJECTS INVOLVED","authors":"Camila Boszko, C. T. W. Rosa","doi":"10.7867/1982-4866.2021V27N1P194-211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work consists of a discussion about the learning potential of learning, as an instrument of expressiveness of metacognitive elements, having as central question the following question: which metacognitive elements are shown to be favored at the moment when the graduates have the value of reflexes as way to learn? The study starts from the identification that the literature has been busy discussing this possibility without, however, presenting a study that shows the details of which metacognitive elements are favored and which deserve to be reviewed. The data for this discussion were produced through semi-structured interviews with eight physics teachers in the initial training process who used learning diaries during an academic semester and linked to a curricular component. The results showed that the learning diaries can be considered to favor this way of thinking. However, the study identified weaknesses in some metacognitive components pointing to the possibility that these diaries are accompanied by guidelines or questionnaires that help the activation of this way of thinking.","PeriodicalId":50561,"journal":{"name":"Dynamis","volume":"41 1","pages":"194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamis","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7867/1982-4866.2021V27N1P194-211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present work consists of a discussion about the learning potential of learning, as an instrument of expressiveness of metacognitive elements, having as central question the following question: which metacognitive elements are shown to be favored at the moment when the graduates have the value of reflexes as way to learn? The study starts from the identification that the literature has been busy discussing this possibility without, however, presenting a study that shows the details of which metacognitive elements are favored and which deserve to be reviewed. The data for this discussion were produced through semi-structured interviews with eight physics teachers in the initial training process who used learning diaries during an academic semester and linked to a curricular component. The results showed that the learning diaries can be considered to favor this way of thinking. However, the study identified weaknesses in some metacognitive components pointing to the possibility that these diaries are accompanied by guidelines or questionnaires that help the activation of this way of thinking.
学习日记作为促进元认知思维的工具:从主体视角下的讨论/学习日记作为促进元认知思维的工具:从主体视角下的讨论
目前的工作包括对学习作为元认知要素表达工具的学习潜力的讨论,并以以下问题为中心问题:当毕业生具有反射作为学习方式的价值时,哪些元认知要素被显示出受到青睐?这项研究从确认文献一直忙于讨论这种可能性开始,然而,没有提出一项研究,表明哪些元认知因素受到青睐,哪些值得审查。本次讨论的数据是通过对八位物理教师的半结构化访谈产生的,这些教师在最初的培训过程中使用了一个学期的学习日记,并与课程组成部分相关联。结果表明,学习日记可以认为有利于这种思维方式。然而,该研究发现了一些元认知成分的弱点,指出这些日记可能伴随着有助于激活这种思维方式的指南或问卷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dynamis
Dynamis 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: DYNAMIS is an international journal devoted to the history of medicine, health and science, founded in 1981, that pays special attention to novel and interdisciplinary historiographic perspectives. It offers original, double peer-reviewed research studies (articles, notes or documents) and reviews in languages of the European Union.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信