Wait, what are we fighting about? – Kelsen, Ehrlich and the reconciliation of normative jurisprudence and sociology of law
IF 0.6
Q2 Social Sciences
Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law
Pub Date : 2021-09-09
DOI:10.1080/07329113.2021.1973204
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The 1915-1917 debate between Ehrlich and Kelsen is a fundamental debate in legal theory, between normative jurisprudence and sociology of law. Although both professors see themselves as being on op...等等，我们在吵什么?——Kelsen, Ehrlich以及规范法学与法律社会学的调和
1915年至1917年埃利希与凯尔森之间的争论是法律理论中规范法学与法律社会学之间的一场根本性争论。尽管两位教授都认为自己处于领先地位……
本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文
求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍：
As the pioneering journal in this field The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law (JLP) has a long history of publishing leading scholarship in the area of legal anthropology and legal pluralism and is the only international journal dedicated to the analysis of legal pluralism. It is a refereed scholarly journal with a genuinely global reach, publishing both empirical and theoretical contributions from a variety of disciplines, including (but not restricted to) Anthropology, Legal Studies, Development Studies and interdisciplinary studies. The JLP is devoted to scholarly writing and works that further current debates in the field of legal pluralism and to disseminating new and emerging findings from fieldwork. The Journal welcomes papers that make original contributions to understanding any aspect of legal pluralism and unofficial law, anywhere in the world, both in historic and contemporary contexts. We invite high-quality, original submissions that engage with this purpose.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
