A comparison of pitfall traps and hand-picking techniques for studying macroathropods abundance in vegetable plots and the influence of abiotic factors on their abundance in Jos, Nigeria

Njila Hl, M. Mafuyai, A. Ombugadu, M. Ishaya, M. Lapang, G. Mwansat
{"title":"A comparison of pitfall traps and hand-picking techniques for studying macroathropods abundance in vegetable plots and the influence of abiotic factors on their abundance in Jos, Nigeria","authors":"Njila Hl, M. Mafuyai, A. Ombugadu, M. Ishaya, M. Lapang, G. Mwansat","doi":"10.31248/JASP2018.088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil macroarthropods are important components that sustain the health and quality of agro-ecosystems for improved agricultural productions though are influenced by abiotic components of the environment. Macroarthropod collections vary across traps due to the fact that some traps can stand for a long time while others such as handpicking cannot. However, traps may be used as a rapid assessment tool to generate checklists for macroarthropod species present in an area within a very short time. To this end, a study on the comparison of pitfall traps and hand-picking techniques for studying macroathropods abundance in vegetable plots and the influence of abiotic factors (temperature and pH) on their abundance in Jos, Nigeria was carried out from August to October, 2014. Pitfall traps and hand-picking techniques were used to collect macroarthropods from six different vegetable plots in three selected villages in Jos North Local Government Area of Plateau State, Nigeria. Soil temperature was recorded in the field while soil samples were obtained from a 7.5 cm depth for measurement of soil pH in the laboratory. A total of 3,346 macroarthropods were collected and pitfall traps had 2,780 (83.08%) while handpicking technique recorded 566 (16.92%). There was a significant difference (P = 0.0076) in the mean abundance of macroarthropods between sampling techniques. Macroarthropods abundance and species richness in relation to vegetable plots varied significantly (P < 0.0001). There was a positive association between pH and macroarthropod abundance (r = 0.13) while temperature did not influence the abundance (r = -0.08). Although, pitfall trap is a passive collector of macroarthropods, it is still a more efficient and preferred sampling techniques for ground crawling arthropods. Farmers should ensure that their soil pH is well maintained at alkaline level so as to influence macroathropods abundance in vegetable plots and ensure robust productivity.","PeriodicalId":14890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Science and Practice","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31248/JASP2018.088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Soil macroarthropods are important components that sustain the health and quality of agro-ecosystems for improved agricultural productions though are influenced by abiotic components of the environment. Macroarthropod collections vary across traps due to the fact that some traps can stand for a long time while others such as handpicking cannot. However, traps may be used as a rapid assessment tool to generate checklists for macroarthropod species present in an area within a very short time. To this end, a study on the comparison of pitfall traps and hand-picking techniques for studying macroathropods abundance in vegetable plots and the influence of abiotic factors (temperature and pH) on their abundance in Jos, Nigeria was carried out from August to October, 2014. Pitfall traps and hand-picking techniques were used to collect macroarthropods from six different vegetable plots in three selected villages in Jos North Local Government Area of Plateau State, Nigeria. Soil temperature was recorded in the field while soil samples were obtained from a 7.5 cm depth for measurement of soil pH in the laboratory. A total of 3,346 macroarthropods were collected and pitfall traps had 2,780 (83.08%) while handpicking technique recorded 566 (16.92%). There was a significant difference (P = 0.0076) in the mean abundance of macroarthropods between sampling techniques. Macroarthropods abundance and species richness in relation to vegetable plots varied significantly (P < 0.0001). There was a positive association between pH and macroarthropod abundance (r = 0.13) while temperature did not influence the abundance (r = -0.08). Although, pitfall trap is a passive collector of macroarthropods, it is still a more efficient and preferred sampling techniques for ground crawling arthropods. Farmers should ensure that their soil pH is well maintained at alkaline level so as to influence macroathropods abundance in vegetable plots and ensure robust productivity.
陷阱和人工采摘技术在尼日利亚乔斯蔬菜田研究大型节肢动物丰度的比较及非生物因素对其丰度的影响
土壤大型节肢动物是维持农业生态系统健康和质量的重要组成部分,对改善农业生产具有重要意义,但也受到环境非生物成分的影响。大型节肢动物的收集在不同的陷阱中有所不同,因为一些陷阱可以保存很长时间,而另一些陷阱(如手工采摘)则不能。然而,捕集器可以作为一种快速评估工具,在很短的时间内生成一个区域内存在的大型节肢动物物种清单。为此,2014年8月至10月在尼日利亚乔斯进行了陷阱诱捕法与人工采摘法的对比研究,研究了蔬菜田大型节肢动物的丰度以及非生物因素(温度和pH)对其丰度的影响。在尼日利亚高原州Jos North地方政府区选定的三个村庄的六个不同菜地,采用陷阱和手工采摘技术采集大型节肢动物。在田间记录土壤温度,同时在实验室从7.5 cm深度处获取土壤样品用于测量土壤pH值。共捕获大型节肢动物3346只,诱蚊法捕获2780只(83.08%),手采法捕获566只(16.92%)。大型节肢动物的平均丰度在不同采样方法间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.0076)。大节肢动物丰度和物种丰富度与菜地相关差异显著(P < 0.0001)。pH与大型节肢动物丰度呈正相关(r = 0.13),而温度对其无显著影响(r = -0.08)。虽然陷阱是大型节肢动物的一种被动采集手段,但它仍然是一种更有效和首选的地面爬行节肢动物采集技术。农民应确保土壤pH保持在良好的碱性水平,以影响菜地中大型节肢动物的丰度,确保强劲的生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信