ECONOMIC DYNAMICS OF DESIGN IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS
Elfana Nasimi Gasimova, Lala Hamlet Mammadova, Gulchohra Salehzadeh, N. B. Huseynova
{"title":"ECONOMIC DYNAMICS OF DESIGN IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE","authors":"Elfana Nasimi Gasimova, Lala Hamlet Mammadova, Gulchohra Salehzadeh, N. B. Huseynova","doi":"10.32342/2074-5354-2022-2-57-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transition from a raw model of development to a creative one, the transformation into a technologically dynamic country capable of developing, producing, and applying high technologies, innovations for large-scale production of competitive goods and services, are considered the most significant components of the strategy for modernizing the economy at the present stage. The study mainly discusses the concept of “creative economy”, its main characteristics, principles, and the international experience of the design economy. Attention is also paid to the consideration of design as a tool and factor in the country’s economic development. The main purpose of writing the article is to study the expanded innovative reproduction system of the economy, to identify its main structural elements. In the last decade, the intensification of globalization, regionalization, modernization and transformation of the economic system has led to a kind of creative development, whose direction and pace are determined by man as an innovator, which increases the relevance of the research topic. The methodological basis of the research was the works of German and other foreign scientists on the problems of economic design. The following research methods were used to perform the tasks: monographic (to study the principles of management of the economic system); system-structural (to study the essence of sustainable economic design); institutional (to study the application of the design problem in institutions); abstract-logical (to make theoretical and methodological generalizations and formulate the results). The main result of the research over time is that the study of the relationship between economics and culture in existing economic models allows for a more in-depth study of the phenomenon of creativity as a factor in innovative processes. The development of research on the role of culture in the formation of human capital can be useful in the study of the main categories of economic development, such as productivity, innovation, creativity. Changes in the focus of cultural economics from the study of cultural heritage and art (welfare model and neoclassical model), as well as a reconsideration of the concept and content of culture, which we observe in these models, can lead to changes in cultural development. Originality/scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the research consists of its plan and the points that were clarified for the first time. The rationality of the funds allocated by the state for creativity, the inactivity of business in this area, the lack of scientific research, the reduction in the number of researchers and engineers were cited as factors hindering the development of the creative economy. Practical value/implications. The practical significance of the research is related to the fact that the research topic, i.e, the creative economy, affects not only the creation of new products, but also their production methods. For example, practical research has shown that Japan is active in this matter. It was known that Japan was the first country to adopt non-traditional and creative approaches, given the peculiarities of the formation and development of the creative economy. Taking into account the Japanese experience, the use of creative abilities of employees based on physical labor can be applied. Given that Japan is constantly improving technologies, methods, directions, forms, industrial ideas, models and organizations to manage production processes and people, we can consider the possibility of applying this practice in our countries.","PeriodicalId":43307,"journal":{"name":"EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32342/2074-5354-2022-2-57-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transition from a raw model of development to a creative one, the transformation into a technologically dynamic country capable of developing, producing, and applying high technologies, innovations for large-scale production of competitive goods and services, are considered the most significant components of the strategy for modernizing the economy at the present stage. The study mainly discusses the concept of “creative economy”, its main characteristics, principles, and the international experience of the design economy. Attention is also paid to the consideration of design as a tool and factor in the country’s economic development. The main purpose of writing the article is to study the expanded innovative reproduction system of the economy, to identify its main structural elements. In the last decade, the intensification of globalization, regionalization, modernization and transformation of the economic system has led to a kind of creative development, whose direction and pace are determined by man as an innovator, which increases the relevance of the research topic. The methodological basis of the research was the works of German and other foreign scientists on the problems of economic design. The following research methods were used to perform the tasks: monographic (to study the principles of management of the economic system); system-structural (to study the essence of sustainable economic design); institutional (to study the application of the design problem in institutions); abstract-logical (to make theoretical and methodological generalizations and formulate the results). The main result of the research over time is that the study of the relationship between economics and culture in existing economic models allows for a more in-depth study of the phenomenon of creativity as a factor in innovative processes. The development of research on the role of culture in the formation of human capital can be useful in the study of the main categories of economic development, such as productivity, innovation, creativity. Changes in the focus of cultural economics from the study of cultural heritage and art (welfare model and neoclassical model), as well as a reconsideration of the concept and content of culture, which we observe in these models, can lead to changes in cultural development. Originality/scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the research consists of its plan and the points that were clarified for the first time. The rationality of the funds allocated by the state for creativity, the inactivity of business in this area, the lack of scientific research, the reduction in the number of researchers and engineers were cited as factors hindering the development of the creative economy. Practical value/implications. The practical significance of the research is related to the fact that the research topic, i.e, the creative economy, affects not only the creation of new products, but also their production methods. For example, practical research has shown that Japan is active in this matter. It was known that Japan was the first country to adopt non-traditional and creative approaches, given the peculiarities of the formation and development of the creative economy. Taking into account the Japanese experience, the use of creative abilities of employees based on physical labor can be applied. Given that Japan is constantly improving technologies, methods, directions, forms, industrial ideas, models and organizations to manage production processes and people, we can consider the possibility of applying this practice in our countries.
国际经验背景下设计的经济动态
从原始的发展模式过渡到创造性的发展模式,转变为一个技术上充满活力的国家,能够开发、生产和应用高技术,大规模生产有竞争力的商品和服务的创新,被认为是现阶段经济现代化战略的最重要组成部分。本研究主要探讨了“创意经济”的概念、主要特征、原理以及设计经济的国际经验。人们还注意到设计作为国家经济发展的工具和因素的考虑。本文的主要目的是研究扩大的创新再生产经济体系,确定其主要结构要素。近十年来,全球化、区域化、现代化和经济体制转型的加剧导致了一种创造性的发展,这种发展的方向和速度是由作为创新者的人决定的,这增加了研究课题的相关性。这项研究的方法论基础是德国和其他外国科学家关于经济设计问题的著作。以下研究方法被用来执行任务:专论(研究经济系统的管理原理);系统结构(研究可持续经济设计的本质);机构(研究设计问题在机构中的应用);抽象-逻辑(做出理论和方法上的概括,并制定结果)。随着时间的推移,研究的主要结果是,在现有的经济模型中研究经济与文化之间的关系,可以更深入地研究创造力作为创新过程中的一个因素的现象。关于文化在人力资本形成中的作用的研究进展,可以对经济发展的主要类别,如生产力、创新、创造力的研究有所帮助。从文化遗产和艺术的研究(福利模型和新古典模型)的文化经济学的焦点的变化,以及我们在这些模型中观察到的对文化概念和内容的重新思考,可以导致文化发展的变化。创意/科学新颖。该研究的科学新颖性包括其计划和首次阐明的要点。国家分配给创意的资金不合理、这一领域的企业不活跃、缺乏科学研究、研究人员和工程师数量减少被认为是阻碍创意经济发展的因素。实用价值和意义。研究的现实意义在于,研究主题即创意经济不仅影响新产品的创造,而且影响新产品的生产方式。例如,实践研究表明,日本在这个问题上是积极的。众所周知,鉴于创意经济形成和发展的特殊性,日本是第一个采用非传统和创造性方法的国家。考虑到日本的经验,可以在体力劳动的基础上运用员工的创造能力。鉴于日本正在不断改进技术、方法、方向、形式、工业理念、模式和组织来管理生产过程和人员,我们可以考虑将这种做法应用于我们国家的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW
EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW ECONOMICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信