Is it possible to change of the duration of consolidation period in the distraction osteogenesis with the repetition of extracorporeal shock waves?

M. Onger, C. Bereket, I. Şener, N. Ozkan, Erman Şenel, A. Polat
{"title":"Is it possible to change of the duration of consolidation period in the distraction osteogenesis with the repetition of extracorporeal shock waves?","authors":"M. Onger, C. Bereket, I. Şener, N. Ozkan, Erman Şenel, A. Polat","doi":"10.4317/medoral.21556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In this study we examined the effects of two different repeated Extracorporeal Shock Waves (ESW) on the consolidation period of the distraction osteogenesis (DO) of the rabbit mandible using stereological, radiological and immunohistochemical methods. Material and Methods DO was performed unilaterally in the mandible of 18 New Zealand rabbits (six months old, weighing between 2.5-3 kg). In the consolidation period, rabbits were divided into three groups randomly after the distraction period. The distraction zone of the mandible was received no treatment as controls (E0*2). Group 2 (E 500*2) received ESWT (twice 500 impulses at 14 kV and 0.19 mJ/mm2 energy) in the first and fourth days of the consolidation. Group 3 (E1000*2) treated with ESWT (twice 1000 impulses at 14 kV and 0.19 mJ/mm2 energy) in the first and fourth days of the consolidation period. After the sacrification, radiologically bone mineral density, new bone formation, new fibrous tissue and new vessel formation were analyzed by stereological. Results It was found a statistically significant difference between the study groups and control group in the bone mineral density measurements and the highest value was in the E1000*2 group. In the stereological analysis, new bone formation was highest in the E1000*2 group and there was a significant difference compared to the other groups (E0*2 and E500*2) (p=0.000). The lowest connective tissue volume was found in the E500*2 and there was a significant difference compared to the other groups (E0*2 and E1000*2) (p=0.000). The volume of the new vessel was highest in the E500*2 and lowest in the E0*2 group. It was found statistically significant difference between the values of the study and control groups. Conclusions Interestingly, we found that repetition of the 1000 impulses ESWT accelerated the consolidation, 500 impulses ESWT extended consolidation period of the DO. Key words:Distraction osteogenesis, extracorporeal shock waves, stereology, rabbit.","PeriodicalId":18367,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","volume":"4 1","pages":"e251 - e257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background In this study we examined the effects of two different repeated Extracorporeal Shock Waves (ESW) on the consolidation period of the distraction osteogenesis (DO) of the rabbit mandible using stereological, radiological and immunohistochemical methods. Material and Methods DO was performed unilaterally in the mandible of 18 New Zealand rabbits (six months old, weighing between 2.5-3 kg). In the consolidation period, rabbits were divided into three groups randomly after the distraction period. The distraction zone of the mandible was received no treatment as controls (E0*2). Group 2 (E 500*2) received ESWT (twice 500 impulses at 14 kV and 0.19 mJ/mm2 energy) in the first and fourth days of the consolidation. Group 3 (E1000*2) treated with ESWT (twice 1000 impulses at 14 kV and 0.19 mJ/mm2 energy) in the first and fourth days of the consolidation period. After the sacrification, radiologically bone mineral density, new bone formation, new fibrous tissue and new vessel formation were analyzed by stereological. Results It was found a statistically significant difference between the study groups and control group in the bone mineral density measurements and the highest value was in the E1000*2 group. In the stereological analysis, new bone formation was highest in the E1000*2 group and there was a significant difference compared to the other groups (E0*2 and E500*2) (p=0.000). The lowest connective tissue volume was found in the E500*2 and there was a significant difference compared to the other groups (E0*2 and E1000*2) (p=0.000). The volume of the new vessel was highest in the E500*2 and lowest in the E0*2 group. It was found statistically significant difference between the values of the study and control groups. Conclusions Interestingly, we found that repetition of the 1000 impulses ESWT accelerated the consolidation, 500 impulses ESWT extended consolidation period of the DO. Key words:Distraction osteogenesis, extracorporeal shock waves, stereology, rabbit.
体外冲击波的重复是否有可能改变牵张成骨的巩固期?
本研究采用体视学、放射学和免疫组织化学方法研究了两种不同的体外冲击波(ESW)对兔下颌骨牵张成骨(DO)巩固期的影响。材料与方法对18只新西兰兔(6月龄,体重2.5-3 kg)下颌骨进行单侧DO。在巩固期,分散期后随机分为三组。下颌骨牵张区不作任何处理,作为对照组(E0*2)。第2组(E 500*2)在固结的第1天和第4天接受ESWT(2次500脉冲,14 kV, 0.19 mJ/mm2能量)。第三组(E1000*2)在固结期的第1天和第4天进行ESWT(2次1000脉冲,14 kV, 0.19 mJ/mm2能量)处理。牺牲后用体视学方法分析骨矿物质密度、新骨形成、新纤维组织和新血管形成。结果研究组骨密度测量值与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义,以E1000*2组最高。体力学分析中,E1000*2组新骨形成率最高,与其他组(E0*2和E500*2)相比差异有统计学意义(p=0.000)。结缔组织体积以E500*2组最低,与其他各组(E0*2和E1000*2)比较差异有统计学意义(p=0.000)。新血管体积在E500*2组最高,在E0*2组最低。发现研究组与对照组的数值有统计学上的显著差异。有趣的是,我们发现重复1000脉冲ESWT加速了DO的巩固,500脉冲ESWT延长了DO的巩固期。关键词:牵张成骨,体外冲击波,体视学,兔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信