Providing the Context for the Debate on the “Human” Imagined in the Drafting of the ANC’S Constitutional Guidelines in Lusaka, 1985–89

A. Odendaal
{"title":"Providing the Context for the Debate on the “Human” Imagined in the Drafting of the ANC’S Constitutional Guidelines in Lusaka, 1985–89","authors":"A. Odendaal","doi":"10.1163/2031-356x-20230102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article attempts to provide an historical context for current debates on South Africa’s 1996 constitution. It argues that the template for the new Constitution was forged by the anc in Lusaka, Zambia between 1985 and 1989, well before the ‘unbannings’ of February 1990 which are generally assumed to have been the starting point of the constitution-making process. The author outlines how the organisation and its allies wove constitutionalism in as one of the distinct threads of an enormously complex, multifaceted and sometimes contradictory process of struggle and constitutional planning that finally pushed the regime into a corner and led to the unbannings of 1990. Besides re-periodising the constitution-making narrative, the article stresses the African ‘essence’ of this struggle and the importance of African agency and ideas in forging the constitutional foundations for the future. Multiple levels of intergenerational experience, thinking and nuance are not catered for in often sloganised debates about the Constitution’s origins. This will require scholars interested in the decolonial project to self-interrogate sometimes mechanistic assumptions about the “inherited” Western underpinnings of the Constitution, it concludes.","PeriodicalId":32512,"journal":{"name":"Afrika Focus","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Afrika Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2031-356x-20230102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article attempts to provide an historical context for current debates on South Africa’s 1996 constitution. It argues that the template for the new Constitution was forged by the anc in Lusaka, Zambia between 1985 and 1989, well before the ‘unbannings’ of February 1990 which are generally assumed to have been the starting point of the constitution-making process. The author outlines how the organisation and its allies wove constitutionalism in as one of the distinct threads of an enormously complex, multifaceted and sometimes contradictory process of struggle and constitutional planning that finally pushed the regime into a corner and led to the unbannings of 1990. Besides re-periodising the constitution-making narrative, the article stresses the African ‘essence’ of this struggle and the importance of African agency and ideas in forging the constitutional foundations for the future. Multiple levels of intergenerational experience, thinking and nuance are not catered for in often sloganised debates about the Constitution’s origins. This will require scholars interested in the decolonial project to self-interrogate sometimes mechanistic assumptions about the “inherited” Western underpinnings of the Constitution, it concludes.
为1985 - 1989年在卢萨卡起草非国大宪法指导方针时所设想的“人”问题的辩论提供背景
本文试图为当前关于南非1996年宪法的辩论提供一个历史背景。它认为,新宪法的模板是由非洲人国民大会于1985年至1989年在赞比亚卢萨卡制定的,远早于1990年2月的“解除禁令”,这通常被认为是制宪进程的起点。作者概述了该组织及其盟友如何将宪政作为一个极其复杂的、多方面的、有时是矛盾的斗争和宪法规划过程的独特线索之一,最终将该政权推向了一个角落,并导致了1990年的禁令。除了重新梳理制宪叙事,这篇文章也强调这场抗争的非洲“本质”,以及非洲机构和理念在打造未来宪法基础上的重要性。在关于宪法起源的辩论中,往往是口号化的,但代际经验、思维和细微差别的多个层面并没有得到考虑。它总结道,这将要求对非殖民项目感兴趣的学者有时对“继承”西方宪法基础的机械假设进行自我质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信