The Dynamics of Social Network Structures and Contestation in the Collaborative Management of Lake Tempe in South Sulawesi

M. Said, B. Kusumasari, M. Baiquni, S. Margono
{"title":"The Dynamics of Social Network Structures and Contestation in the Collaborative Management of Lake Tempe in South Sulawesi","authors":"M. Said, B. Kusumasari, M. Baiquni, S. Margono","doi":"10.30589/PGR.V2I3.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In managing common pool resources; ideally, it was carried out using a co-management approach that facilitated the cooperation, sharing of power, and responsibility among actors. However, this is quite difficult to achieve since each actor competes against each other’s interests. Such cooperation and competition between actors will form a structure of social networks. This study aims to explain the dynamics of the formation of social network structures based on the cooperation and competition among actors in the management of Lake Tempe, a common pool resource crossing Wajo, Soppeng and Sidenreng Rappang Regencies in South Sulawesi Province. This is a qualitative study with explanatory case study approach, using two data collection techniques: participatory observation and in-depth interview with the government, fishermen, businessmen, and NGOs. This study found that the formation process of the social network structure in the management of Lake Tempe is a dynamic interaction among actors, i.e., cooperation in one side and competition on the other side, forming a social networking structure in two types: centrality and heterogeneity network. Network centrality occurs at the level of decision-making, the rules of play, and the allocation of resources, which is dominated by government actors, while heterogeneity network is dominated by communities that are still maintaining social capital such as kinship as well as knowledge and resources sharing. Brokerages, those who link the advantaged groups (local government and big-scale-fisherman/Pallawang) with the disadvantaged (small-scale-fisherman/ Pakkajalalla) do not exist in the management. Although the existence of brokerages is potential, they may also have a conflict of interest, since authorities and economic factors will be their target.","PeriodicalId":32198,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Governance Review","volume":"62 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Governance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30589/PGR.V2I3.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In managing common pool resources; ideally, it was carried out using a co-management approach that facilitated the cooperation, sharing of power, and responsibility among actors. However, this is quite difficult to achieve since each actor competes against each other’s interests. Such cooperation and competition between actors will form a structure of social networks. This study aims to explain the dynamics of the formation of social network structures based on the cooperation and competition among actors in the management of Lake Tempe, a common pool resource crossing Wajo, Soppeng and Sidenreng Rappang Regencies in South Sulawesi Province. This is a qualitative study with explanatory case study approach, using two data collection techniques: participatory observation and in-depth interview with the government, fishermen, businessmen, and NGOs. This study found that the formation process of the social network structure in the management of Lake Tempe is a dynamic interaction among actors, i.e., cooperation in one side and competition on the other side, forming a social networking structure in two types: centrality and heterogeneity network. Network centrality occurs at the level of decision-making, the rules of play, and the allocation of resources, which is dominated by government actors, while heterogeneity network is dominated by communities that are still maintaining social capital such as kinship as well as knowledge and resources sharing. Brokerages, those who link the advantaged groups (local government and big-scale-fisherman/Pallawang) with the disadvantaged (small-scale-fisherman/ Pakkajalalla) do not exist in the management. Although the existence of brokerages is potential, they may also have a conflict of interest, since authorities and economic factors will be their target.
南苏拉威西坦佩湖协同管理中的社会网络结构动态与竞争
管理共同资源;理想情况下,它是通过一种共同管理的方法来执行的,这种方法促进了参与者之间的合作、权力和责任的分享。然而,这很难实现,因为每个演员都在相互竞争利益。行动者之间的这种合作与竞争将形成社会网络结构。本研究旨在解释基于坦佩湖(Lake Tempe)管理中行为者之间的合作与竞争的社会网络结构形成的动态。坦佩湖是南苏拉威西省横跨Wajo、Soppeng和Sidenreng Rappang三个县的公共资源池。这是一项采用解释性案例研究方法的定性研究,采用两种数据收集技术:参与式观察和对政府、渔民、商人和非政府组织的深度访谈。本研究发现,坦佩湖管理社会网络结构的形成过程是行动者之间的动态互动,即一方是合作,另一方是竞争,形成了中心性网络和异质性网络两种类型的社会网络结构。网络中心性发生在决策、游戏规则和资源配置层面,由政府行为体主导,而异质性网络则由仍然保持社会资本的社区(如亲属关系)以及知识和资源共享主导。将有利群体(地方政府和大型渔民/帕拉旺)与弱势群体(小规模渔民/ Pakkajalalla)联系起来的中间人在管理中不存在。尽管券商的存在是有潜力的,但它们也可能存在利益冲突,因为当局和经济因素将是它们的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信