Establishing the normative and comparative needs of assistive technology provision in Queensland from the agency and funding scheme perspective.

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Modernism/modernity Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-22 DOI:10.1017/BrImp.2023.10
Christy Hogan, Louise Gustafsson, Amelia Di Tommaso, Tenelle Hodson, Michelle Bissett, Camila Shirota
{"title":"Establishing the normative and comparative needs of assistive technology provision in Queensland from the agency and funding scheme perspective.","authors":"Christy Hogan, Louise Gustafsson, Amelia Di Tommaso, Tenelle Hodson, Michelle Bissett, Camila Shirota","doi":"10.1017/BrImp.2023.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Assistive technology services and devices support the participation and inclusion of people living with disability. In Australia, the regulatory bodies, agencies and schemes that manage assistive technology provision are governed by national and / or state-based Acts and Legislation. This study examined the assistive technology sector from the perspective of the regulatory bodies, agencies and schemes.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>Regulatory bodies, agencies and schemes that manage funding for assistive technology in Australia were identified by the research team. A website audit reviewed publicly available documents and information. Semi-structured interviews with representatives from the agencies and schemes were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The audit (<i>n</i> =17) found that the range and level of information publicly available was variable. The availability of assistive technology for driving and transport, design and building for access and safety, and mobility was most often promoted. The qualitative findings (<i>n</i> = 11) indicated variability and challenges within four themes: <i>operationalising the legislation</i>; <i>internal assistive technology processes; reasonable and necessary;</i> and <i>risks in the assistive technology pathway</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regulatory bodies, agencies and schemes are critical to the effectiveness of the sector. The findings identified opportunities for the organisations to review how internal processes are communicated publicly, and for the sector to address the perceived risks related to health professional availability, knowledge and skills, and limited accessibility to trial assistive technology. Subsequent studies explored the perspectives of the assistive technology advisors and suppliers and the recipients of assistive technology services and devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":18699,"journal":{"name":"Modernism/modernity","volume":"2 1","pages":"204-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modernism/modernity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2023.10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Assistive technology services and devices support the participation and inclusion of people living with disability. In Australia, the regulatory bodies, agencies and schemes that manage assistive technology provision are governed by national and / or state-based Acts and Legislation. This study examined the assistive technology sector from the perspective of the regulatory bodies, agencies and schemes.

Design and methods: Regulatory bodies, agencies and schemes that manage funding for assistive technology in Australia were identified by the research team. A website audit reviewed publicly available documents and information. Semi-structured interviews with representatives from the agencies and schemes were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim.

Findings: The audit (n =17) found that the range and level of information publicly available was variable. The availability of assistive technology for driving and transport, design and building for access and safety, and mobility was most often promoted. The qualitative findings (n = 11) indicated variability and challenges within four themes: operationalising the legislation; internal assistive technology processes; reasonable and necessary; and risks in the assistive technology pathway.

Conclusions: Regulatory bodies, agencies and schemes are critical to the effectiveness of the sector. The findings identified opportunities for the organisations to review how internal processes are communicated publicly, and for the sector to address the perceived risks related to health professional availability, knowledge and skills, and limited accessibility to trial assistive technology. Subsequent studies explored the perspectives of the assistive technology advisors and suppliers and the recipients of assistive technology services and devices.

从机构和资助计划的角度确定昆士兰提供辅助技术的规范和比较需求。
背景和目的:辅助技术服务和设备有助于残疾人的参与和融入。在澳大利亚,管理辅助技术提供的监管组织、机构和计划受国家和/或州法案和立法的管辖。本研究从监管组织、机构和计划的角度对辅助技术行业进行了研究:研究小组确定了澳大利亚管理辅助技术资金的监管机构、部门和计划。网站审计审查了可公开获得的文件和信息。对这些机构和计划的代表进行了半结构化访谈,并进行了录音和逐字记录:审计(n=17)发现,公开信息的范围和水平参差不齐。最常宣传的是驾驶和交通辅助技术的可用性、无障碍和安全设计与建筑,以及移动性。定性研究结果(n = 11)表明,在以下四个主题中存在差异和挑战:法律的可操作性;内部辅助技术流程;合理性和必要性;以及辅助技术途径中的风险:监管组织、机构和计划对该行业的有效性至关重要。研究结果表明,各组织有机会审查内部流程的公开沟通方式,该行业也有机会解决与卫生专业人员的可用性、知识和技能以及试用辅助技术的可及性有限相关的预期风险。随后的研究探讨了辅助技术顾问和供应商以及辅助技术服务和设备接受者的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Modernism/modernity
Modernism/modernity HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Concentrating on the period extending roughly from 1860 to the present, Modernism/Modernity focuses on the methodological, archival, and theoretical exigencies particular to modernist studies. It encourages an interdisciplinary approach linking music, architecture, the visual arts, literature, and social and intellectual history. The journal"s broad scope fosters dialogue between social scientists and humanists about the history of modernism and its relations tomodernization. Each issue features a section of thematic essays as well as book reviews and a list of books received. Modernism/Modernity is now the official journal of the Modernist Studies Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信