Achille tra le rose (negli anni di Napoleone). Femminilizzazione del guerriero nella Penthesilea di Heinrich von Kleist

IF 0.1 Q4 WOMENS STUDIES
M. Stella
{"title":"Achille tra le rose (negli anni di Napoleone). Femminilizzazione del guerriero nella Penthesilea di Heinrich von Kleist","authors":"M. Stella","doi":"10.36253/sd-11466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The hypothesis I advance in this article is that the character of Achilles in Heinrich von Kleist’s Penthesilea embodies the Object of desire of the female protagonist, the queen of the Amazons. By the word “Object”, I mean the interiorised and imaginary representation Penthesilea phantasises within herself about an otherwise unknown “thing” desired which finally takes the feminine features of a tender and harmless boy wearing crowns and garlands of roses, an “Achilles among the roses”, as it were – the word “rose” being both the anagram of “eros” and the emblem of the female sex. In the course of the analysis, I argue that this “mirage” of Penthesilea, the “thing desired”, is the projection of the “Thing itself”, maternal love, which, being unredeemedly lost to her, turns into a persecutory ghost. My understanding of von Kleist’s Penthesilea is not rooted in Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalysis, but both in the historical and political context in which the tragedy of the queen of the Amazon was conceived and in the transcendental and idealistic philosophy of the Subject.","PeriodicalId":40628,"journal":{"name":"Storia delle Donne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Storia delle Donne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/sd-11466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The hypothesis I advance in this article is that the character of Achilles in Heinrich von Kleist’s Penthesilea embodies the Object of desire of the female protagonist, the queen of the Amazons. By the word “Object”, I mean the interiorised and imaginary representation Penthesilea phantasises within herself about an otherwise unknown “thing” desired which finally takes the feminine features of a tender and harmless boy wearing crowns and garlands of roses, an “Achilles among the roses”, as it were – the word “rose” being both the anagram of “eros” and the emblem of the female sex. In the course of the analysis, I argue that this “mirage” of Penthesilea, the “thing desired”, is the projection of the “Thing itself”, maternal love, which, being unredeemedly lost to her, turns into a persecutory ghost. My understanding of von Kleist’s Penthesilea is not rooted in Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalysis, but both in the historical and political context in which the tragedy of the queen of the Amazon was conceived and in the transcendental and idealistic philosophy of the Subject.
玫瑰中的阿基里斯(拿破仑时代)。海因里希·冯·克莱斯特(Heinrich von Kleist)的《Penthesilea》(Penthesilea)中战士的女性化
本文提出的假设是,海因里希·冯·克莱斯特的《彭忒西莉亚》中阿喀琉斯的性格体现了女主人公——亚马逊女女王的欲望对象。“对象”这个词,我指的是彭忒西莉亚在自己内心幻想的一个不为人知的“东西”,它最终呈现出一个温柔而无害的男孩的女性特征,戴着玫瑰花冠和花环,是“玫瑰中的阿喀琉斯”,就像它一样——“玫瑰”这个词既是“爱神”的变位词,也是女性的象征。在分析的过程中,我认为潘德西莉亚的这种“海市蜃楼”,即“渴望之物”,是“物本身”——母爱的投射,而母爱由于无法挽回地失去,变成了一个受迫害的幽灵。我对冯·克莱斯特的《彭忒西莉亚》的理解并不根植于弗洛伊德和拉康的精神分析,而是根植于亚马逊女王悲剧的历史和政治背景,以及主体的先验和唯心主义哲学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Storia delle Donne
Storia delle Donne WOMENS STUDIES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信