Establishment of national diagnostic dose reference levels (DRLs) for routine computed tomography examinations in Jordan

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
K. Radaideh, A. Al-Radaideh, R. Ramli, A. Saleh, Rasha Alshayeb
{"title":"Establishment of national diagnostic dose reference levels (DRLs) for routine computed tomography examinations in Jordan","authors":"K. Radaideh, A. Al-Radaideh, R. Ramli, A. Saleh, Rasha Alshayeb","doi":"10.2478/pjmpe-2023-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Dose reference levels (DRLs) are used as indicators as well as guidance for dose optimization and to ensure justification of appropriate dose for a given clinical indication. The main aims of this study were to establish local DRLs for each CT imaging protocol as a reference point to evaluate the radiation dose indices and to compare our DRLs with those established in other countries and against the internationally reported guidelines. Materials and methods: 2000 CT dose reports of different adult imaging protocols from January 2021 until April 2022 were collected retrospectively at different hospitals in Jordan. Data were collected from CT scans that were performed using different types and models of CT scanners and included four adult non-enhanced, helical CT imaging protocols; Head, Chest, Abdomen-Pelvis, and Chest-Abdomen-Pelvis. Results: The average doses of CTDIvol, DLP, and effective dose were (65.11 mGy, 1232.71 mGy·cm, 2.83 mSv) for the head scan, (16.6 mGy, 586.6 mGy·cm, 8.21 mSv) for the chest scan, (17.91 mGy, 929.9 mGy·cm, 13.9 mSv) for the abdomen-pelvis scan, and (19.3 mGy, 1152 mGy·cm, 17.25 mSv) for the chest-abdomen-pelvis scan. In comparison with results from different international studies, DLP values measured in the present study were lower for the chest-abdomen-pelvis and abdomen-pelvis CT scans, and higher for the head CT and chest CT scans. Conclusions: It is very important that each country establishes its own DRLs and compares them with those reported by other countries, especially the developed ones. It is also important that these levels are regularly updated.","PeriodicalId":53955,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering","volume":"6 1","pages":"26 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2023-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Dose reference levels (DRLs) are used as indicators as well as guidance for dose optimization and to ensure justification of appropriate dose for a given clinical indication. The main aims of this study were to establish local DRLs for each CT imaging protocol as a reference point to evaluate the radiation dose indices and to compare our DRLs with those established in other countries and against the internationally reported guidelines. Materials and methods: 2000 CT dose reports of different adult imaging protocols from January 2021 until April 2022 were collected retrospectively at different hospitals in Jordan. Data were collected from CT scans that were performed using different types and models of CT scanners and included four adult non-enhanced, helical CT imaging protocols; Head, Chest, Abdomen-Pelvis, and Chest-Abdomen-Pelvis. Results: The average doses of CTDIvol, DLP, and effective dose were (65.11 mGy, 1232.71 mGy·cm, 2.83 mSv) for the head scan, (16.6 mGy, 586.6 mGy·cm, 8.21 mSv) for the chest scan, (17.91 mGy, 929.9 mGy·cm, 13.9 mSv) for the abdomen-pelvis scan, and (19.3 mGy, 1152 mGy·cm, 17.25 mSv) for the chest-abdomen-pelvis scan. In comparison with results from different international studies, DLP values measured in the present study were lower for the chest-abdomen-pelvis and abdomen-pelvis CT scans, and higher for the head CT and chest CT scans. Conclusions: It is very important that each country establishes its own DRLs and compares them with those reported by other countries, especially the developed ones. It is also important that these levels are regularly updated.
在约旦建立常规计算机断层扫描检查的国家诊断剂量参考水平
背景:剂量参考水平(Dose reference level, drl)被用作剂量优化的指标和指导,以确保针对特定临床适应症的适当剂量是合理的。本研究的主要目的是为每个CT成像方案建立当地的drl,作为评估辐射剂量指数的参考点,并将我们的drl与其他国家建立的drl和国际报告的指南进行比较。材料和方法:回顾性收集了约旦不同医院2021年1月至2022年4月2000份不同成人成像方案的CT剂量报告。数据来自使用不同类型和型号的CT扫描仪进行的CT扫描,包括四种成人非增强螺旋CT成像方案;头部,胸部,腹部-骨盆和胸部-腹部-骨盆。结果:CTDIvol的平均剂量、DLP和有效剂量分别为头部扫描(65.11 mGy, 1232.71 mGy·cm, 2.83 mSv)、胸部扫描(16.6 mGy, 586.6 mGy·cm, 8.21 mSv)、腹部-骨盆扫描(17.91 mGy, 929.9 mGy·cm, 13.9 mSv)和胸腹-骨盆扫描(19.3 mGy, 1152 mGy·cm, 17.25 mSv)。与国际上不同的研究结果相比,本研究测量的胸腹骨盆和腹部骨盆CT扫描的DLP值较低,而头部CT和胸部CT扫描的DLP值较高。结论:各国建立自己的drl,并与其他国家特别是发达国家的drl进行比较是非常重要的。定期更新这些水平也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering
Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering (PJMPE) (Online ISSN: 1898-0309; Print ISSN: 1425-4689) is an official publication of the Polish Society of Medical Physics. It is a peer-reviewed, open access scientific journal with no publication fees. The issues are published quarterly online. The Journal publishes original contribution in medical physics and biomedical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信