Analysis of the application of methane-bearing capacity test methods in the conditions of Polish mining

IF 0.7 Q4 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Marcin Karbownik
{"title":"Analysis of the application of methane-bearing capacity test methods in the conditions of Polish mining","authors":"Marcin Karbownik","doi":"10.46873/2300-3960.1365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The methane hazard is one of the natural hazards occurring in hard coal mining. The content of natural methane in hard coal seams, the so-called methane-bearing capacity, is one of the key parameters that allow for proper assessment of the methane hazard and the state of the threat of gas and rock outbursts. For safety purposes, there is a constant need to improve the methods for the determination of this parameter. In the conditions of Polish mining, the method used for methane-bearing capacity determination is the direct drill cuttings method. This paper contains a comparative study presenting three different methods of methane-bearing capacity determination. Tests were conducted using two direct methods (the drill cuttings method and the United States Bureau of Mines (USBM) method), and the indirect method based on the desorption intensity index. On the basis of the obtained test results, it was found that the results obtained with the USBM method were slightly higher than those obtained with the direct drill cuttings method. Gas losses, an important element affecting the final value of the assay, were also analysed. This comparative study will evaluate the validity and applicability of the above methods under specific conditions in hard coal mining.","PeriodicalId":37284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Mining","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46873/2300-3960.1365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The methane hazard is one of the natural hazards occurring in hard coal mining. The content of natural methane in hard coal seams, the so-called methane-bearing capacity, is one of the key parameters that allow for proper assessment of the methane hazard and the state of the threat of gas and rock outbursts. For safety purposes, there is a constant need to improve the methods for the determination of this parameter. In the conditions of Polish mining, the method used for methane-bearing capacity determination is the direct drill cuttings method. This paper contains a comparative study presenting three different methods of methane-bearing capacity determination. Tests were conducted using two direct methods (the drill cuttings method and the United States Bureau of Mines (USBM) method), and the indirect method based on the desorption intensity index. On the basis of the obtained test results, it was found that the results obtained with the USBM method were slightly higher than those obtained with the direct drill cuttings method. Gas losses, an important element affecting the final value of the assay, were also analysed. This comparative study will evaluate the validity and applicability of the above methods under specific conditions in hard coal mining.
甲烷承载能力测试方法在波兰采矿条件下的应用分析
摘要甲烷灾害是硬煤开采中发生的自然灾害之一。硬煤层中天然甲烷的含量,即含甲烷能力,是正确评价瓦斯危险性和瓦斯岩突出威胁状态的关键参数之一。为了安全起见,需要不断改进测定该参数的方法。在波兰开采条件下,测定甲烷承载能力的方法是直接钻屑法。本文对三种不同的甲烷承载能力测定方法进行了比较研究。试验采用两种直接法(钻屑法和美国矿产局(USBM)法)和基于脱附强度指数的间接法进行。根据获得的试验结果,发现USBM法获得的结果略高于直接钻屑法获得的结果。气体损失是影响测定最终值的重要因素,也进行了分析。本对比研究将对上述方法在硬煤开采具体条件下的有效性和适用性进行评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sustainable Mining
Journal of Sustainable Mining Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信