Acesso à Informação e a sua percepção na forma de política pública (de Estado): a alteração da regulamentação da Lei de Acesso à Informação e o sigilo dos estudos iniciais da Reforma da Previdência

Rafael Gustavo Cavichiolo, Nei Alberto Salles Filho
{"title":"Acesso à Informação e a sua percepção na forma de política pública (de Estado): a alteração da regulamentação da Lei de Acesso à Informação e o sigilo dos estudos iniciais da Reforma da Previdência","authors":"Rafael Gustavo Cavichiolo, Nei Alberto Salles Filho","doi":"10.5212/EMANCIPACAO.V.20.2014353.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the aspects related to Access to Information under the bias of public policy (of State), considering the publication of Decree n.o 9,690, of January 23, 2019, which introduced changes in the regulation of the Access to Information Law, and the declaration of the confidentiality of the data that support the Social Security Reform proposal, converted into Constitutional Amendment n.o 103, of November 12, 2019 and the recent attempt to restrict Access to Information due to the Pandemic. This is a documentary and bibliographic research, with analysis qualitative, supported by data collected from the open public information systems of federal agencies and information vehicles. A brief analysis of the conjuncture related to the alleged intention to restrict Access to Information is made, which characterizes a serious affront to a basic constitutional guarantee, with scope for possible violations regarding human rights.","PeriodicalId":34078,"journal":{"name":"Emancipacao","volume":"31 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emancipacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5212/EMANCIPACAO.V.20.2014353.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the aspects related to Access to Information under the bias of public policy (of State), considering the publication of Decree n.o 9,690, of January 23, 2019, which introduced changes in the regulation of the Access to Information Law, and the declaration of the confidentiality of the data that support the Social Security Reform proposal, converted into Constitutional Amendment n.o 103, of November 12, 2019 and the recent attempt to restrict Access to Information due to the Pandemic. This is a documentary and bibliographic research, with analysis qualitative, supported by data collected from the open public information systems of federal agencies and information vehicles. A brief analysis of the conjuncture related to the alleged intention to restrict Access to Information is made, which characterizes a serious affront to a basic constitutional guarantee, with scope for possible violations regarding human rights.
(国家)公共政策形式下的信息获取及其感知:信息获取法法规的变化和养老金改革初步研究的保密性
本文考虑到2019年1月23日第9,690号法令的发布,该法令对《信息获取法》的规定进行了修改,并宣布了支持社会保障改革提案的数据的机密性,并将其转化为11月12日第103号宪法修正案,分析了公共政策(国家)偏见下的信息获取相关方面。2019年以及最近因大流行而限制获取信息的尝试。这是一项文献和书目研究,定性分析,从联邦机构和信息工具的公开公共信息系统收集的数据支持。对据称意图限制获取信息的情况作了简要分析,这是对基本宪法保障的严重侵犯,并有可能侵犯人权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信