Metascientific views: Challenge and opportunity for philosophy of biology in practice

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
E. Serrelli
{"title":"Metascientific views: Challenge and opportunity for philosophy of biology in practice","authors":"E. Serrelli","doi":"10.19272/201700701005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I take evolutionary biology as an example to reflect on the role of philosophy and on the transformations that philosophy is constantly stimulated to do in its own approach when dealing with science. I consider that some intellectual movements within evolutionary biology (more specifically, the various calls for ‘synthesis’) express metascientific views, i.e., claims about ‘what it is to do research’ in evolutionary biology at different times. In the construction of metascientific views I see a fundamental role to be played by philosophy, and, at the same time, a need to complement the philosophical methods with many more methods coming from other sciences. What leads philosophy out of itself is its own attention to scientific practice. My humble methodological suggestions are, at this stage, only meant to help us imagine metascientific views that are built with a more scientific, interdisciplinary approach, in order to attenuate partiality, subjectivity and impressionism in describing the scientific community. And yet, we should not be naive and imbued with the myth of ‘data-driven’ research, especially in this field: other complex issues about metascientific views call for a serious, constant philosophical reflection on scientific practice.","PeriodicalId":41562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Philosophica","volume":"24 1","pages":"65-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Philosophica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19272/201700701005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper I take evolutionary biology as an example to reflect on the role of philosophy and on the transformations that philosophy is constantly stimulated to do in its own approach when dealing with science. I consider that some intellectual movements within evolutionary biology (more specifically, the various calls for ‘synthesis’) express metascientific views, i.e., claims about ‘what it is to do research’ in evolutionary biology at different times. In the construction of metascientific views I see a fundamental role to be played by philosophy, and, at the same time, a need to complement the philosophical methods with many more methods coming from other sciences. What leads philosophy out of itself is its own attention to scientific practice. My humble methodological suggestions are, at this stage, only meant to help us imagine metascientific views that are built with a more scientific, interdisciplinary approach, in order to attenuate partiality, subjectivity and impressionism in describing the scientific community. And yet, we should not be naive and imbued with the myth of ‘data-driven’ research, especially in this field: other complex issues about metascientific views call for a serious, constant philosophical reflection on scientific practice.
元科学观:生物哲学在实践中的挑战与机遇
在本文中,我以进化生物学为例,反思哲学的作用,以及哲学在处理科学问题时不断受到刺激以自己的方式进行的转变。我认为,进化生物学中的一些智力运动(更具体地说,是对“综合”的各种呼吁)表达了元科学的观点,即在不同时期对进化生物学中“做研究是什么”的主张。在构建元科学观点的过程中,我看到哲学将扮演一个基本的角色,同时,需要用来自其他科学的更多方法来补充哲学方法。使哲学脱离自身的是哲学对科学实践的关注。在这个阶段,我的方法论建议只是为了帮助我们想象用更科学的、跨学科的方法建立起来的元科学观点,以减少描述科学界时的偏袒、主观性和印象主义。然而,我们不应该天真地沉浸在“数据驱动”研究的神话中,尤其是在这个领域:关于元科学观点的其他复杂问题需要对科学实践进行认真、持续的哲学反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Philosophica
Acta Philosophica PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信