Comparison of methods for the determination of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus from bovine mastitis.

J. Schlegelova, D. Rysánek, I. Sediva, V. Babak
{"title":"Comparison of methods for the determination of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus from bovine mastitis.","authors":"J. Schlegelova, D. Rysánek, I. Sediva, V. Babak","doi":"10.1046/J.1439-0450.2001.00413.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of three standard methods (broth dilution, agar dilution, disk diffusion) and an experimental modification of the microdilution method for determination of resistance to ampicillin, cephalotin, cloxacillin, neomycin, novobiocin, penicillin and streptomycin were compared using 151 Staphylococcus aureus isolates obtained from cases of mastitis. The accuracy of the dilution methods was compared by determination of minimum inhibition concentrations (MIC, MIC50, MIC90 and modal MIC) and by assessment of the agreement within the tolerance of +/-1 dilution step in 2-fold dilution series. The results of the dilution methods were further compared with those of the reference disk diffusion method and the strains were classified as sensitive or resistant using the interpretation criteria for human strains. The comparisons indicated that MIC characteristics and the final classification as sensitive or resistant were method-dependent. Resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics was observed more often when using broth dilution methods, especially when the broth was supplemented with lactose.","PeriodicalId":17659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health","volume":"1 1","pages":"21-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1439-0450.2001.00413.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The results of three standard methods (broth dilution, agar dilution, disk diffusion) and an experimental modification of the microdilution method for determination of resistance to ampicillin, cephalotin, cloxacillin, neomycin, novobiocin, penicillin and streptomycin were compared using 151 Staphylococcus aureus isolates obtained from cases of mastitis. The accuracy of the dilution methods was compared by determination of minimum inhibition concentrations (MIC, MIC50, MIC90 and modal MIC) and by assessment of the agreement within the tolerance of +/-1 dilution step in 2-fold dilution series. The results of the dilution methods were further compared with those of the reference disk diffusion method and the strains were classified as sensitive or resistant using the interpretation criteria for human strains. The comparisons indicated that MIC characteristics and the final classification as sensitive or resistant were method-dependent. Resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics was observed more often when using broth dilution methods, especially when the broth was supplemented with lactose.
牛乳腺炎金黄色葡萄球菌耐药性测定方法的比较。
采用肉汤稀释法、琼脂稀释法、圆盘扩散法3种标准方法和实验改进的微量稀释法对乳腺炎病例中分离的151株金黄色葡萄球菌进行氨苄西林、头孢菌素、氯西林、新霉素、新生物霉素、青霉素和链霉素的耐药性测定。通过测定最小抑制浓度(MIC, MIC50, MIC90和模态MIC)和评估2倍稀释系列中+/-1稀释步骤公差范围内的一致性来比较稀释方法的准确性。将稀释法检测结果与参考纸片扩散法检测结果进行比较,按照人株解释标准将菌株分为敏感菌株和耐药菌株。比较表明MIC特征和最终的敏感或抗性分类与方法有关。当使用肉汤稀释法时,对氨基糖苷类抗生素的耐药性更常见,特别是当肉汤中添加乳糖时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信