Selection of Alternative Working Methods using the Crashing and Microsoft Project Methods

Muhammad Djuneydi, Yudi Setio Prabowo, M. O. Mahendra
{"title":"Selection of Alternative Working Methods using the Crashing and Microsoft Project Methods","authors":"Muhammad Djuneydi, Yudi Setio Prabowo, M. O. Mahendra","doi":"10.35940/ijeat.e4130.0612523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In carrying out the PPLP Banten Building construction project, it experienced delays. The causes of delays are the addition of time, changes in shop drawings and material delays. Then the solution in theMicrosoft project is an alternative crashing method of 4 hours of overtime and work shifts. The research results obtained 18 jobs that are on the critical path of 43 jobs. The normal total duration is 942 days and the normal fee is Rp. 569.100.000 using AHSP. The results obtained are the total duration of the alternative crashing 4 hours of overtime work is 678 days, while the work shift is 530 days, the AHSP Project produces an alternative total cost of 4 hours overtime of Rp. 3.066.675.000 and work shifts with accident costs of Rp. 1.223.565.000. The alternative cost of 4 hours of overtime using the AHSP project is Rp. 193.067.245,23 and work shifts using the AHSP project of Rp. 33.638.199,58 then the work shift alternative is more economical and was chosen to be applied to the project. The results of the comparison of direct and indirect costs for the 4-hour overtime alternative are direct costs Rp. 9.672.161.032,2 indirect costs Rp. 1.322.728.805,77 and direct costs for work shift alternatives Rp.9.512.731.986,58 costs Rp. 1.273.456.116,78 then the work shift alternative is more economical and is chosen to be applied to the project.","PeriodicalId":13981,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.e4130.0612523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In carrying out the PPLP Banten Building construction project, it experienced delays. The causes of delays are the addition of time, changes in shop drawings and material delays. Then the solution in theMicrosoft project is an alternative crashing method of 4 hours of overtime and work shifts. The research results obtained 18 jobs that are on the critical path of 43 jobs. The normal total duration is 942 days and the normal fee is Rp. 569.100.000 using AHSP. The results obtained are the total duration of the alternative crashing 4 hours of overtime work is 678 days, while the work shift is 530 days, the AHSP Project produces an alternative total cost of 4 hours overtime of Rp. 3.066.675.000 and work shifts with accident costs of Rp. 1.223.565.000. The alternative cost of 4 hours of overtime using the AHSP project is Rp. 193.067.245,23 and work shifts using the AHSP project of Rp. 33.638.199,58 then the work shift alternative is more economical and was chosen to be applied to the project. The results of the comparison of direct and indirect costs for the 4-hour overtime alternative are direct costs Rp. 9.672.161.032,2 indirect costs Rp. 1.322.728.805,77 and direct costs for work shift alternatives Rp.9.512.731.986,58 costs Rp. 1.273.456.116,78 then the work shift alternative is more economical and is chosen to be applied to the project.
选择使用崩溃和微软项目方法的替代工作方法
在执行PPLP万腾大厦建设项目时,它经历了延误。延误的原因是时间的增加,车间图纸的变化和材料的延误。那么,微软项目的解决方案是另一种崩溃方法,即4小时的加班和轮班。研究结果显示,在43个工作岗位的关键路径上有18个工作岗位。使用AHSP的正常总持续时间为942天,正常费用为569.10万卢比。结果表明:替代加班4小时总持续时间为678天,班次为530天,AHSP项目产生替代加班4小时总成本为3.066.675.000 Rp,班次事故成本为1.223.565.000 Rp。采用AHSP方案加班4小时的替代成本为Rp. 193.067.245,23,而采用Rp. 33.638.199,58的AHSP方案的替代成本更经济,因此选择该方案应用于该项目。4小时加班替代方案的直接成本和间接成本比较结果为直接成本Rp. 9.672.161.032,间接成本Rp. 1.322.728.805,77,倒班替代方案的直接成本Rp.9.512.731.986,58成本Rp. 1.273.456.116,78,因此倒班替代方案更经济,并被选择应用于该项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信