{"title":"A Comparative study of early postpartum IUCD insertion to interval IUCD insertion at Tertiary Care Centre","authors":"Roopal, V. Bisht","doi":"10.7439/IJBAR.V9I4.4758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A Comparative study of early postpartum IUCD insertion to interval IUCD insertion at Tertiary Care Centre.Methods: This prospective study was conducted among 100 women at tertiary care centre, Haldwani, Nainital. Patients were divided in to two groups. Group A (n=50)-post placental insertion within 10 minutes of delivery of placenta. Group B (n=50)-Interval insertion after 6 weeks of delivery. Both groups were compared in terms of pain abdomen, bleeding, missing thread, expulsion, infection, UTI, perforation, pregnancy immediately after insertion, after 6 weeks and after 6 months.Result: At the time of insertion there was more difficulty in insertion and cramps in interval group than post placental group (14% vs 4% and 24% vs 12%). At the end of 6 months lower abdominal pain and excessive bleeding less in post placental than interval period (5.12% vs 11.90% and 5.12% vs 14.28%). There was no case of perforation or pregnancy in both the groups. There were less cases of missing thread ,vaginal discharge, UTI and removal rate in post placental group as compare to interval group(2.56% vs 9.52%,7.69% vs 14.28% , 5.12% vs 9.52% and 5.12% vs 11.90%). Expulsion rate was more in post placental group (2.56% vs 0%). At the end of 6 month continuation rate was more in post placental group than interval group (92.30% vs 88.09%)Conclusion: Post placental IUCD is thus found to be more effective, safe and better mean of contraception when compared with Interval period.","PeriodicalId":13848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","volume":"28 1","pages":"162-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBAR.V9I4.4758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A Comparative study of early postpartum IUCD insertion to interval IUCD insertion at Tertiary Care Centre.Methods: This prospective study was conducted among 100 women at tertiary care centre, Haldwani, Nainital. Patients were divided in to two groups. Group A (n=50)-post placental insertion within 10 minutes of delivery of placenta. Group B (n=50)-Interval insertion after 6 weeks of delivery. Both groups were compared in terms of pain abdomen, bleeding, missing thread, expulsion, infection, UTI, perforation, pregnancy immediately after insertion, after 6 weeks and after 6 months.Result: At the time of insertion there was more difficulty in insertion and cramps in interval group than post placental group (14% vs 4% and 24% vs 12%). At the end of 6 months lower abdominal pain and excessive bleeding less in post placental than interval period (5.12% vs 11.90% and 5.12% vs 14.28%). There was no case of perforation or pregnancy in both the groups. There were less cases of missing thread ,vaginal discharge, UTI and removal rate in post placental group as compare to interval group(2.56% vs 9.52%,7.69% vs 14.28% , 5.12% vs 9.52% and 5.12% vs 11.90%). Expulsion rate was more in post placental group (2.56% vs 0%). At the end of 6 month continuation rate was more in post placental group than interval group (92.30% vs 88.09%)Conclusion: Post placental IUCD is thus found to be more effective, safe and better mean of contraception when compared with Interval period.
背景:在三级保健中心对产后早期植入IUCD与间隔植入IUCD进行比较研究。方法:本前瞻性研究在奈尼塔尔哈尔德瓦尼三级保健中心的100名妇女中进行。患者被分为两组。A组(50例):胎盘植入后胎盘娩出10分钟内。B组(n=50):分娩6周后插入间期。比较两组在腹部疼痛、出血、漏线、排出、感染、尿路感染、穿孔、插入后立即妊娠、6周后妊娠和6个月后妊娠情况。结果:置入时,间隔组置入困难和痉挛发生率高于胎盘后组(14%比4%,24%比12%)。6个月结束时,产后下腹痛和大出血发生率低于间歇期(5.12% vs 11.90%, 5.12% vs 14.28%)。两组均未发生穿孔或妊娠。胎盘后组的缺线、阴道分泌物、尿路感染和拔除率均低于间隔组(2.56%比9.52%,7.69%比14.28%,5.12%比9.52%,5.12%比11.90%)。产后娩出率高于对照组(2.56% vs 0%)。6个月结束时,胎盘后宫内节育器的延续率高于间歇期组(92.30% vs 88.09%)。结论:与间歇期相比,胎盘后宫内节育器是一种更有效、更安全、更好的避孕手段。