Effects of removable functional orthodontic apparatus on mandibular condyle bone quality

IF 0.2 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Betül Yüzbaşıoğlu Ertuğrul
{"title":"Effects of removable functional orthodontic apparatus on mandibular condyle bone quality","authors":"Betül Yüzbaşıoğlu Ertuğrul","doi":"10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aims to compare the impact of dynamic functional orthodontic appliances on mandibular condyle bone density in patients with Class I, Class II, and Class III malocclusion during their growth and development phases. \nMethodology: The histories of patients with three separate malocclusions who received dynamic functional orthodontic appliance treatment were analyzed in this retrospective study. Twenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into four groups: maxillary expansion devices (Group A), twinblock/monoblock devices (Group B), face masks (Group C), and chincups (Group D). The fractal analysis approach was used to determine the mandibular condyle bone density by analyzing panoramic films taken from the patients at the beginning (T0) and end (T1) of treatment. \nResults: In Groups A and B, the results of the mandibular condyle bone fractal analysis decreased at the end of treatment compared with the pre-treatment results (p < 0.05). In Groups C and D, the post-treatment results were better than the pre-treatment ones (p < 0.05). \nConclusion: Among the different malocclusion groups, some dynamic functional orthodontic appliances (maxillary expansion and twinblock/monoblock devices) enabled an increase in bone density in the mandibular condyle, while some (face masks and chincups) decreased the density. It is important to conduct orthodontic treatment by analyzing the results obtained with the use of these appliances. \n  \nHow to cite this article: Yüzbaşıoğlu Ertuğrul B. Effects of removable functional orthodontic apparatus on mandibular condyle bone quality. Int Dent Res 2021;11(Suppl.1):7-11. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.2 \n  \nLinguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.","PeriodicalId":31322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to compare the impact of dynamic functional orthodontic appliances on mandibular condyle bone density in patients with Class I, Class II, and Class III malocclusion during their growth and development phases. Methodology: The histories of patients with three separate malocclusions who received dynamic functional orthodontic appliance treatment were analyzed in this retrospective study. Twenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into four groups: maxillary expansion devices (Group A), twinblock/monoblock devices (Group B), face masks (Group C), and chincups (Group D). The fractal analysis approach was used to determine the mandibular condyle bone density by analyzing panoramic films taken from the patients at the beginning (T0) and end (T1) of treatment. Results: In Groups A and B, the results of the mandibular condyle bone fractal analysis decreased at the end of treatment compared with the pre-treatment results (p < 0.05). In Groups C and D, the post-treatment results were better than the pre-treatment ones (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Among the different malocclusion groups, some dynamic functional orthodontic appliances (maxillary expansion and twinblock/monoblock devices) enabled an increase in bone density in the mandibular condyle, while some (face masks and chincups) decreased the density. It is important to conduct orthodontic treatment by analyzing the results obtained with the use of these appliances.   How to cite this article: Yüzbaşıoğlu Ertuğrul B. Effects of removable functional orthodontic apparatus on mandibular condyle bone quality. Int Dent Res 2021;11(Suppl.1):7-11. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.2   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.
可移动功能正畸器对下颌髁突骨质量的影响
目的:本研究旨在比较动态功能矫治器对ⅰ类、ⅱ类、ⅲ类错颌生长发育阶段髁突骨密度的影响。方法:回顾性分析3例独立错颌患者的动态功能矫治器治疗史。28例患者符合纳入标准,分为上颌扩张器组(A组)、双块/单块器械组(B组)、面罩组(C组)、帽舌组(D组)4组。通过分析患者治疗开始(T0)和结束(T1)时拍摄的全片,采用分形分析法测定髁突骨密度。结果:A、B组治疗结束时髁突骨分形分析结果较治疗前下降(p < 0.05)。C、D组治疗后效果优于治疗前(p < 0.05)。结论:在不同的错颌组中,一些动态功能矫治器(上颌扩张器和双块/单块矫治器)使下颌髁突骨密度增加,而一些动态功能矫治器(面罩和帽舌)使下颌髁突骨密度降低。通过分析使用这些矫治器获得的结果来进行正畸治疗是很重要的。B.可移动功能正畸器对下颌髁突骨质量的影响。国际医学杂志,2021;11(增刊1):7-11。https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.2语言修改:本手稿中的英语已由至少两名专业编辑检查,他们都是英语母语者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信