Measuring income inequality: comparative datasets and methodological deficiencies. An overview of income inequality in Romania during postsocialism

Ionuț-Marian Anghel
{"title":"Measuring income inequality: comparative datasets and methodological deficiencies. An overview of income inequality in Romania during postsocialism","authors":"Ionuț-Marian Anghel","doi":"10.1515/scr-2017-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article delineates the main methodological deficiencies and datasets available for comparing income inequality at the European and world level. The article is divided in two parts. In the first part of the article, I present the main datasets and methodological deficiencies when trying to compare income inequality in the world. Although efforts have been made in the last decades to generate comparative databases, the qualities of some indicators are rather doubtful and also there is no common ground on conceptualizing inequality indicators and measuring them, some of which are income-based, while others are household expenditure-based. Then, I present two classical studies on studying income inequality after the Washington consensus. In the second part of the article I sketch an overview of rising income inequality in Romania after 1989 by presenting some income inequality indicators and comparing them with other former CEE countries. However, I will pinpoint that Romania’s case is rather exceptional in the EU and, when comparing standard income inequality indicators, further explication needs to be delivered. I conclude that while income inequality is the result of macro-structural changes that occurred during the transition to market capitalism, political decisions are not to be played-down.","PeriodicalId":83295,"journal":{"name":"The Urban & social change review","volume":"10 1","pages":"55 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Urban & social change review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/scr-2017-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The article delineates the main methodological deficiencies and datasets available for comparing income inequality at the European and world level. The article is divided in two parts. In the first part of the article, I present the main datasets and methodological deficiencies when trying to compare income inequality in the world. Although efforts have been made in the last decades to generate comparative databases, the qualities of some indicators are rather doubtful and also there is no common ground on conceptualizing inequality indicators and measuring them, some of which are income-based, while others are household expenditure-based. Then, I present two classical studies on studying income inequality after the Washington consensus. In the second part of the article I sketch an overview of rising income inequality in Romania after 1989 by presenting some income inequality indicators and comparing them with other former CEE countries. However, I will pinpoint that Romania’s case is rather exceptional in the EU and, when comparing standard income inequality indicators, further explication needs to be delivered. I conclude that while income inequality is the result of macro-structural changes that occurred during the transition to market capitalism, political decisions are not to be played-down.
衡量收入不平等:比较数据集和方法缺陷。后社会主义时期罗马尼亚收入不平等概况
摘要本文描述了主要的方法缺陷和数据集,可用于比较欧洲和世界水平的收入不平等。本文分为两部分。在文章的第一部分,我提出了主要的数据集和方法上的缺陷,试图比较世界上的收入不平等。虽然在过去几十年里作出了努力来编制比较数据基,但有些指标的质量相当令人怀疑,而且在不平等指标的概念和衡量方面也没有共同的基础,其中一些是基于收入的,而另一些是基于家庭支出的。然后,介绍了华盛顿共识之后研究收入不平等的两项经典研究。在文章的第二部分,我通过提出一些收入不平等指标并将其与其他前中东欧国家进行比较,概述了1989年后罗马尼亚收入不平等加剧的情况。然而,我要指出的是,罗马尼亚的情况在欧盟相当特殊,在比较标准收入不平等指标时,需要提供进一步的解释。我的结论是,虽然收入不平等是在向市场资本主义过渡期间发生的宏观结构变化的结果,但政治决策也不应被淡化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信