Online Proctoring’s Impact on Students and Student Privacy

Tessca Almeida
{"title":"Online Proctoring’s Impact on Students and Student Privacy","authors":"Tessca Almeida","doi":"10.7771/2158-4052.1561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online proctoring software (OPS) claims to fortify education by attempting to provide a controlled virtual testing environment, ideally reducing the amount of cheating on online assessments; however, scholars, students, and education technology specialists have raised significant concerns about student privacy and algorithmic discrimination in OPS. This study analyzed survey data from 86 Purdue undergraduate students regarding their sentiment and experience using OPS. After providing informed consent, demographic information, and OPS usage, students indicated via 5-point Likert scale to what extent they agreed or disagreed with statements gauging perceptions of identification accuracy, data privacy, knowledge about student data rights, and academic integrity. Participants also could share additional reflections via two free-response questions.","PeriodicalId":30386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7771/2158-4052.1561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online proctoring software (OPS) claims to fortify education by attempting to provide a controlled virtual testing environment, ideally reducing the amount of cheating on online assessments; however, scholars, students, and education technology specialists have raised significant concerns about student privacy and algorithmic discrimination in OPS. This study analyzed survey data from 86 Purdue undergraduate students regarding their sentiment and experience using OPS. After providing informed consent, demographic information, and OPS usage, students indicated via 5-point Likert scale to what extent they agreed or disagreed with statements gauging perceptions of identification accuracy, data privacy, knowledge about student data rights, and academic integrity. Participants also could share additional reflections via two free-response questions.
网络监考对学生和学生隐私的影响
在线监考软件(OPS)声称通过提供受控的虚拟测试环境来加强教育,理想情况下可以减少在线评估中的作弊行为;然而,学者、学生和教育技术专家对OPS中的学生隐私和算法歧视提出了重大担忧。本研究分析了86名普渡大学本科生关于使用OPS的感受和体验的调查数据。在提供知情同意、人口统计信息和OPS使用情况后,学生通过5分李克特量表表明他们在多大程度上同意或不同意识别准确性、数据隐私、学生数据权利知识和学术诚信等方面的陈述。参与者还可以通过两个自由回答问题分享更多的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信